Vacuuous
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
 Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...
found 78 articles for 0.304 sec
On Apr 17, 12:34 am, "Reidiot®" <hormelf...@happyhealthy.net> wrote: > > Way to go Reidiot®, you just couldn't stand to let that youngster be > > could you? > Yes, I deeply wounded the pride of the "youngster" "Harried > Bray-Lie"... Oh yeah, and him too, not that it matters at all as you treat every person you encounter the same shameful shitty way and have the audacity to think yourself     

Group: alt.movies.kubrick · Group Profile · Search for Vacuuous in alt.movies.kubrick
Author: ichorwhip
Date: Apr 17, 2008 18:41

On Apr 17, 12:34 am, "Reidiot®" <hormelf...@happyhealthy.net> wrote: Way to go Reidiot®, you just couldn't stand to let that youngster be could you? Yes, I deeply wounded the pride of the "youngster" "Harried Bray-Lie"... Oh yeah, and him too, not that it matters at all as you treat every person you encounter the same shameful shitty way and have the audacity to think yourself
Show full article (8.42Kb) · Show article thread
Way to go Reidiot®, you just couldn't stand to let that youngster be could you? It's one thing to criticize someone's mediocre and verbose writing and thoughts (which weren't too far off the mark actually), but you had to get personally insulting and offer nothing constructive as you have venomous and vacuuous commentary down to a fart... No wonder you are a registered moron. Also I don't     

Group: alt.movies.kubrick · Group Profile · Search for Vacuuous in alt.movies.kubrick
Author: ichorwhip
Date: Apr 17, 2008 18:09

Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote: peachy ashie passion <exquisitepeach@hotmail.com> wrote in news:p07Hj.5$QW6.0@trnddc07: Dragonlady wrote: "peachy ashie passion" <exquisitepeach@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:qIWGj.5122$VK4.734@trnddc08... Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote: "Dragonlady" <dragonladynospam@cableone.net
Show full article (8.42Kb) · Show article thread
peachy ashie passion <exquisitepeach@hotmail.com> wrote in news:p07Hj.5$QW6.0@trnddc07: > Dragonlady wrote: > >> >> "peachy ashie passion" <exquisitepeach@hotmail.com> wrote in >> message news:qIWGj.5122$VK4.734@trnddc08... >> >>> Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote: >>> >>>> "Dragonlady" <dragonladynospam@cableone.net> wrote in >>>> news:fsghgp$i07$1@registered.motzarella.org:     

Group: alt.movies.kubrick · Group Profile · Search for Vacuuous in alt.movies.kubrick
Author: ichorwhip
Date: Apr 16, 2008 20:04

On Fri, 7 Mar 2008 21:12:43 -0800 (PST), franklinhu@yahoo.com wrote: On Mar 7, 7:36 am, John C. Polasek <jpola...@cfl.rr.com> wrote: On Thu, 6 Mar 2008 23:07:25 -0800 (PST), frankli...@yahoo.com wrote: Why would you think the positrons remain behind? Experimentally, we know that during "pair" production we most definitely see 2 particles being produced - a positron and
Show full article (1.46Kb) · Show article thread
On Mar 7, 7:36 am, John C. Polasek <jpola...@cfl.rr.com> wrote: > On Thu, 6 Mar 2008 23:07:25 -0800 (PST), frankli...@yahoo.com wrote: > >> >Why would you think the positrons remain behind? Experimentally, we > >> >know that during "pair" production we most definitely see 2 particles > >> >being produced - a positron and an electron. You are suggesting that > >> >we only see the "electron" which     

Group: alt.tv.heroes · Group Profile · Search for Vacuuous in alt.tv.heroes
Author: peachy ashie passion
Date: Mar 30, 2008 17:09

On Thu, 6 Mar 2008 23:07:25 -0800 (PST), franklinhu@yahoo.com wrote: Why would you think the positrons remain behind? Experimentally, we know that during "pair" production we most definitely see 2 particles being produced - a positron and an electron. You are suggesting that we only see the "electron" which is not true. If the positron was left behind, then where does the
Show full article (23.67Kb) · Show article thread
> >Why would you think the positrons remain behind? Experimentally, we > >know that during "pair" production we most definitely see 2 particles > >being produced - a positron and an electron. You are suggesting that > >we only see the "electron" which is not true. If the positron was left > >behind, then where does the positron that we observe come from? > > Pair production is merely an accident     

Group: alt.tv.heroes · Group Profile · Search for Vacuuous in alt.tv.heroes
Author: Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy
Date: Mar 28, 2008 09:38

On Thu, 6 Mar 2008 13:10:31 -0800 (PST), franklinhu@yahoo.com wrote: On Mar 6, 6:58 am, John C. Polasek <jpola...@cfl.rr.com> wrote: On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 22:49:30 -0800 (PST), frankli...@yahoo.com wrote: On Mar 1, 10:58 am, John C. Polasek <jpola...@cfl.rr.com> wrote: On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 18:57:27 -0800 (PST), PD I see you are now using positrons and electrons, but you
Show full article (21.75Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: sci.physics · Group Profile · Search for Vacuuous in sci.physics
Author: John C. Polasek
Date: Mar 8, 2008 19:36

Show full article (13.70Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: sci.physics · Group Profile · Search for Vacuuous in sci.physics
Author: franklinhu
Date: Mar 7, 2008 21:12

Show full article (11.14Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: sci.physics · Group Profile · Search for Vacuuous in sci.physics
Author: John C. Polasek
Date: Mar 7, 2008 07:36

Show full article (6.59Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: sci.physics · Group Profile · Search for Vacuuous in sci.physics
Author: franklinhu
Date: Mar 6, 2008 23:07

Show full article (4.40Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: sci.physics · Group Profile · Search for Vacuuous in sci.physics
Author: John C. Polasek
Date: Mar 6, 2008 16:41

Show full article (4.82Kb) · Show article thread
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · next