On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 22:02:42 GMT, "Don Kelly" <dhky@shaw.ca> wrote: ---------------------------- "John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message news:da70l31khhrpo8a55uljv743ecdhhakcl6@4ax.com... On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 17:26:27 -0800 (PST), "Autymn D. C." <lysdexia@sbcglobal.net> wrote: On Nov 28, 4:27 pm, John Fields <jfie...@austininstruments.com> wrote:

On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 17:26:27 -0800 (PST), "Autymn D. C." <lysdexia@sbcglobal.net> wrote: On Nov 28, 4:27 pm, John Fields <jfie...@austininstruments.com> wrote: On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 14:54:18 -0800 (PST), "Autymn D. C." <lysde...@sbcglobal.net> wrote: On Nov 26, 7:01 pm, "Don Kelly" <d...@shaw.ca> wrote: ---------------------------- "Green Xenon [Radium]" <gluceg

On Nov 29, 9:40 pm, Benj <bjac...@iwaynet.net> wrote: On Nov 29, 8:26 pm, "Autymn D. C." <lysde...@sbcglobal.net> wrote: Condensed materials' fases (That's "fases", in Hellènic, not "fezys".) are very structurally-sensitive, and can easily transition between ferromagnetism and ferri- or antiferro- without tiht control of species' ratios at fabrication. So such a magnetic

On Nov 29, 8:26 pm, "Autymn D. C." <lysde...@sbcglobal.net> wrote: Condensed materials' fases (That's "fases", in Hellènic, not "fezys".) are very structurally-sensitive, and can easily transition between ferromagnetism and ferri- or antiferro- without tiht control of species' ratios at fabrication. So such a magnetic zap /could/ disrupt a magnet's domains such thas its atoms realign

Scripsit Andy Dingley: No, it isn't. It has many markup elements and attributes that are far from minimal. It certainly does, 3.2 far more so than 4.01 Are you kidding, or did you just write the exact opposite of what you meant. However compared to what it _could_ have been, as exemplified by DocBook, HTML 3.0 or whatever HTML 3.0 might have spawned as a successor, then