On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 15:19:44 -0800, Peter Franks wrote: Peter Franks wrote: I'm struggling to find a legitimate constitutional basis for the Federal Government to get into the insurance business, specifically the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968. Link: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode42/usc_sec_42_00004001----000-.html I find those arguements underwhelming

On Mon, 14 May 2007 07:01:16 +0200, "Normandy" <aabbcc@wanadoo.fr> wrote: It was mentioned that the US had a fund for the uninsured who received treatment in American hospitals. Wonder if anyone can reference this all I can find is there is a fund for legal American residents over 65 US CODE: Title 42426a. Transitional provision on eligibility of ... There are authorized

----- Forwarded message from declan@well.com ----- Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 01:06:38 -0800 From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com> Reply-To: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com> Subject: [Politech] Data retention: Not just ISPs, but Google, domain registrars, and more? [priv] To: politech@politechbot.com The Bush administration has made it entirely clear that new laws forcing Internet service