Alex Selby wrote: Thomas Womack wrote: In article <d99ek35t7mr5asj720ntp21s6evp58rg0a@news.markshouse.net>, Mark Goodge <usenet@listmail.good-stuff.co.uk> wrote: http://www.alexpoole.info/academic/literaturereview.html seems to agree with you, at least as far as readability is concerned. However, http://psychology.wichita.edu/surl/usabilitynews/3W/fontJR.htm suggests
Thomas Womack wrote: In article <d99ek35t7mr5asj720ntp21s6evp58rg0a@news.markshouse.net>, Mark Goodge <usenet@listmail.good-stuff.co.uk> wrote: http://www.alexpoole.info/academic/literaturereview.html seems to agree with you, at least as far as readability is concerned. However, http://psychology.wichita.edu/surl/usabilitynews/3W/fontJR.htm suggests that children, while capable
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 19:22:38 +0000, Mark Goodge <usenet@listmail.good-stuff.co.uk> wrote: http://www.alexpoole.info/academic/literaturereview.html seems to agree with you, at least as far as readability is concerned. However, http://psychology.wichita.edu/surl/usabilitynews/3W/fontJR.htm suggests that children, while capable of reading other fonts equally well, do prefer comic sans
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 13:53:35 +0000, Jon Green put finger to keyboard and typed: Mark Ayliffe wrote: On or about 2007-11-23, Guy Snape <guy@snapefamily.theobvious.org.uk> illuminated us with: Just Say No to comic sans. Seriously? Why? It's certainly the most readily available child-friendly font. Ohhh, there's a point of contention! From my own experience, this idea
