Us Patent Office
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

found 9685 articles for 1.567 sec
On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 13:29:07 -0700, "Kadaitcha Man" <pummelling.milk.trays@alt.pets.ferrets.denuded-slit.net.china> wrote: >To someone with bogus invention like this one. >There is no specific mention of material used in his electrolysis. > I bet the patent office doesn't have an engineer to verify >whether or not the invention is working. No patent needs to actually function as intended     

Group: alt.energy · Group Profile · Search for Us Patent Office in alt.energy
Author: Peter Hill
Date: Jul 22, 2008 10:28

Kadaitcha Man wrote: "Kadaitcha Man" <pummelling.milk.trays@alt.pets.ferrets.denuded-slit.net.china> wrote in message news:rcCdnU6A3NCuPR7VnZ2dnUVZ_hCdnZ2d@posted.toastnet... To someone with bogus invention like this one. There is no specific mention of material used in his electrolysis. I bet the patent office doesn't have an engineer to verify whether or not the invention is working
Show full article (2.70Kb) · Show article thread
>"Kadaitcha Man" <pummelling.milk.trays@alt.pets.ferrets.denuded-slit.net.china> wrote in message >news:rcCdnU6A3NCuPR7VnZ2dnUVZ_hCdnZ2d@posted.toastnet... >To someone with bogus invention like this one. There is no specific mention of material used in his >electrolysis. I bet the patent office doesn't have an engineer to verify whether or not the invention is >working. For example like the flaw     

Group: alt.energy · Group Profile · Search for Us Patent Office in alt.energy
Author: Don Lancaster
Date: Jul 20, 2008 17:06

To someone with bogus invention like this one. There is no specific mention of material used in his electrolysis. I bet the patent office doesn't have an engineer to verify whether or not the invention is working. For example like the flaw, it's related to the problem that Coast to Coast tester mentionned earlier last week, he was having problem with Oxygen Sensor and "Engine light came on."
Show full article (2.11Kb) · Show article thread
"pltrgyst" <pltrgyst@spamlessxhost.org> wrote in message news:qqnou3tbp8pl1s16ahqnbv1ltc7veb3oqf@4ax.com... > On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 20:03:31 -0400, "John J. Bengii" <nobody@yahoo.calm.dwn> > wrote: > > >The US Patent Office and system is a crock of shit. > > Ah, well, there we have it. Indeed. > The US Patent Office and system are exactly what Congress desires them to be. "We the people"     

Group: alt.energy · Group Profile · Search for Us Patent Office in alt.energy
Author: Kadaitcha Man
Date: Jul 20, 2008 13:36

On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 20:03:31 -0400, "John J. Bengii" <nobody@yahoo.calm.dwn> wrote: The US Patent Office and system is a crock of shit. Ah, well, there we have it. The US Patent Office and system are exactly what Congress desires them to be. There is only one prerequisite for a patent to be approved in the USA...did they apply? Hmm, maybe you ddn't read the OP's "Over the last
Show full article (1.24Kb) · Show article thread
I'd go for an inverse charge. No fee to apply. However, if anyone proves the patent invalid, the Patent Office must pay the "prover" $50K plus costs ;-) In the past I've done a lot of expert witness consulting. This year, though, I've lost a lot of business by telling potential clients that their patent wasn't worth the powder to blow it to hell. Unfortunately I sure they found themselves     

Group: alt.energy · Group Profile · Search for Us Patent Office in alt.energy
Author: Kadaitcha Man
Date: Jul 20, 2008 13:29

The US Patent Office and system is a crock of shit. This is like the USA building a Great Wall of China around itself for technology and the USA will eventually be left behind in the tech world. There is only one prerequisite for a patent to be approved in the USA...did they apply? This has been proven in many patent infringement suits in the USA to date. If you contest an Intellectual Patent
Show full article (0.85Kb)
On Feb 19, 5:13 pm, Randy Poe <poespam-t...@yahoo.com> wrote: > On Feb 18, 5:31 pm, torque <ue83jtr...@execs.com> wrote: > > > another pioneer anomaly > > > how could he get such a good job, while he > > only was a just graduated small engineer, > > with no experience in doing engineering > > whatsoever > > He was a patent examiner. then "was" has another meaning in your contry at tha     

Group: comp.home.automation · Group Profile · Search for Us Patent Office in comp.home.automation
Author: Robert Green
Date: Mar 28, 2008 06:19

On Feb 18, 5:31 pm, torque <ue83jtr...@execs.com> wrote: another pioneer anomaly how could he get such a good job, while he only was a just graduated small engineer, with no experience in doing engineering whatsoever He was a patent examiner. he had no experience, no good marks, as i understood, and he also was not very tall and pretty He had decent marks, he graduated
Show full article (4.59Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: comp.home.automation · Group Profile · Search for Us Patent Office in comp.home.automation
Author: pltrgyst
Date: Mar 27, 2008 20:07

Show full article (1.31Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: comp.home.automation · Group Profile · Search for Us Patent Office in comp.home.automation
Author: Jim Thompson
Date: Mar 27, 2008 17:17

Show full article (3.16Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: comp.home.automation · Group Profile · Search for Us Patent Office in comp.home.automation
Author: John J. Bengii
Date: Mar 27, 2008 17:03

Show full article (2.03Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: sci.physics.relativity · Group Profile · Search for Us Patent Office in sci.physics.relativity
Author: torque
Date: Feb 19, 2008 12:43

Show full article (1.62Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: sci.physics.relativity · Group Profile · Search for Us Patent Office in sci.physics.relativity
Author: Randy Poe
Date: Feb 19, 2008 08:13

Show full article (1.10Kb) · Show article thread
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · next