JoAnne Schmitz wrote: On Thu, 01 May 2008 23:57:09 +0000, "Bill Bonde ( 'the oblique allusion in lieu of the frontal attack' )" <tributyltinpaint@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: Mikko Peltoniemi wrote: Bill Bonde ( 'the oblique allusion in lieu of the frontal attack' ) wrote: Yet if you "take ownership" you can see them? Doesn't that mean that there's no
On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 16:13:17 -0400, herbzet <herbzet@gmail.com> wrote: Lester Zick wrote: Randy Poe wrote: Lester Zick wrote: Theorem: There is a real number line. Is this a theorem in the sense of being a necessarily true theorem or is this only a speculation? It's pretty much meaningless, till you give some starting axioms and some definition
In article <MPG.21188fa7c862affe98a5a8@newsgroups.comcast.net>, Mark Borgerson <mborgerson@comcast.net> wrote: In article <marek1-B428A7.23103830072007@news.lga.highwinds-media.com>, marek1@cox.net says... In article <MPG.2116ab8eedf5edb898a59d@newsgroups.comcast.net>, Mark Borgerson <mborgerson@comcast.net> wrote: In article <marek1-CD7550.12000029072007@news.lga
http://atwitsend.org/currentcommentaries.html 9/30/06 - Fascism Here We Come! & An Upleasant Confrontation in the Forest I'm not sure where to start or even how to start this column. To those of you who read this rant regularly, you'll note the American Epitaph above. That was written over 2 years ago and not much has changed. In fact, things have only got worse. And I tend to view this upcoming
