Unsegregated
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

found 48 articles for 0.303 sec
<bobjanes@btinternet.com> wrote in message news:a094e164-ef1b-4793-a4db-bcb0ec9acfaa@56g2000hsm.googlegroups.com... On 29 Aug, 07:27, FREECOSPIRIT <freecospi...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: > For obvious reasons ladies cannot use urinals... On the contrary, like public nudity, it's just a cultural thing. There are a number of designs for female urinals, and many already in operation, especially     

Group: uk.rec.naturist · Group Profile · Search for Unsegregated in uk.rec.naturist
Author: Ric blondie64
Date: Sep 1, 2008 14:30

<bobjanes@btinternet.com> wrote in message news:a094e164-ef1b-4793-a4db-bcb0ec9acfaa@56g2000hsm.googlegroups.com... On 29 Aug, 07:27, FREECOSPIRIT <freecospi...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: For obvious reasons ladies cannot use urinals... On the contrary, like public nudity, it's just a cultural thing. There are a number of designs for female urinals, and many already in operation, especially
Show full article (1.54Kb) · Show article thread
On 29 Aug, 07:27, FREECOSPIRIT <freecospi...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: >  For obvious reasons ladies cannot use urinals... On the contrary, like public nudity, it's just a cultural thing. There are a number of designs for female urinals, and many already in operation, especially in American universities it seems. Bit of an equality thing going on there I presume. There are also devices such     

Group: uk.rec.naturist · Group Profile · Search for Unsegregated in uk.rec.naturist
Author: Ric blondie64
Date: Sep 1, 2008 14:20

http://www.tenerifenews.com/cms/front_content.php?client=1&lang=1&idcat=8&idart=8498 http://tinyurl.com/6aa2rv Well, would you or wouldn’t you? Take all your clothes off to sunbathe on the beach here in Tenerife or swim in the nude in the sea, that is? Many of you will instantly say “yes, absolutely no problem” whilst others, regardless of your age, will find the whole idea totally unacceptable
Show full article (1.54Kb) · Show article thread
Paul Boyd wrote: > On 11/08/2008 15:07, Colin Nelson said, > >> Many of the mixed use unsegregated paths are only 1' wider than a >> standard footpath. <SNIP> > > You're wasting your time - I've just realised that nully is another > judith, or even the same one. > Oh dear, looks like you were right after all Judith. I've posted criticism of a cyclist, therefore I must be a troll. Sorry     

Group: uk.rec.naturist · Group Profile · Search for Unsegregated in uk.rec.naturist
Author: bobjanes
Date: Aug 29, 2008 13:39

"nully" <nully@null.void> wrote in message news:oDVnk.100983$dz3.23509@newsfe20.ams2... Colin Nelson wrote: Around the Lincoln area we have both types, though most of the mixed use non-segregated paths leave much to be desired for 'comfortable' use by either pedestrians or cyclists when both use the path at the same time. Most of the roads leave much to be desired for comfortable
Show full article (1.06Kb) · Show article thread
Charlie Hulme wrote: > R.C. Payne wrote: > >> >> It also is the only major tramway I know of that still uses >> exclusively trolley-poles for current collection. It's astounding >> that something that is such a 1930s throw back (with '70s cars to >> replace the PCCs) is still running in such origional condition. Seems >> odd to me that neither Siemens nor Alstom bid for that contract     

Group: uk.rec.naturist · Group Profile · Search for Unsegregated in uk.rec.naturist
Author: Anna
Date: Aug 19, 2008 11:23

On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:30:47 +0100 someone who may be "Mortimer" <me@privacy.net> wrote this:- What are the rules about who has priority over whom on a designated cycle track or other place where bikes *are* allowed? Depends whether it is a segregated path or not. If unsegregated then the ancient generic rules apply,the same ones as on the road. In the absence of markings to the contrary
Show full article (6.11Kb)
In article <MPG.22b0e08dc960e311989a7a@news.nildram.co.uk>, junk@raven-family.invalid (Tony Raven) wrote: > In article <h5i*lOzes@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>, eleanor@the- > blairs.co.uk says... > > Andrew Mobbs wrote: > > >Kensington & Chelsea are apparently going to trial allowing cycling > > >the "wrong way" along unsegregated one way streets (sort of). > > > > We already have this     

Group: uk.rec.cycling · Group Profile · Search for Unsegregated in uk.rec.cycling
Author: nully
Date: Aug 11, 2008 11:10

Show full article (0.57Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: uk.rec.cycling · Group Profile · Search for Unsegregated in uk.rec.cycling
Author: Paul Boyd
Date: Aug 11, 2008 11:02

Show full article (0.28Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: uk.rec.cycling · Group Profile · Search for Unsegregated in uk.rec.cycling
Author: Colin Nelson
Date: Aug 11, 2008 07:07

Show full article (2.37Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: uk.railway · Group Profile · Search for Unsegregated in uk.railway
Author: Stephen Farrow
Date: Jul 31, 2008 16:20

Show full article (2.55Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: uk.railway · Group Profile · Search for Unsegregated in uk.railway
Author: David Hansen
Date: Jun 26, 2008 08:17

Show full article (1.91Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: cam.transport · Group Profile · Search for Unsegregated in cam.transport
Author: Colin Rosenstiel
Date: Jun 12, 2008 13:34

Show full article (1.29Kb) · Show article thread
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · next