Unitarity
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
 Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...
found 308 articles for 0.307 sec
Thus spake Peter <enders@dekasges.de> > >> >> Following (albeit tardily) the suggestion of Peter (to whom thanks), I >> >> have revised the section on unitarity of U, to give a mathematical proof >> >> from conservation of the norm >> >> >> >> http://www.teleconnection.info/rqg/Evolution#ContinuityOfTimeEvolution > >It might be helpful for readers jumping into your treatment at this point to     

Group: sci.physics.foundations · Group Profile · Search for Unitarity in sci.physics.foundations
Author: Oh No
Date: Aug 12, 2008 09:11

Thus spake Peter <enders@dekasges.de> Following (albeit tardily) the suggestion of Peter (to whom thanks), I have revised the section on unitarity of U, to give a mathematical proof from conservation of the norm http://www.teleconnection.info/rqg/Evolution#ContinuityOfTimeEvolution Looks better now :-) Further remarks: 1) "If the
Show full article (0.92Kb) · Show article thread
> >> Following (albeit tardily) the suggestion of Peter (to whom thanks), I > >> have revised the section on unitarity of U, to give a mathematical proof > >> from conservation of the norm > >> > >> http://www.teleconnection.info/rqg/Evolution#ContinuityOfTimeEvolution > >Looks better now :-) > > > >Further remarks: > > > >1) "If the fundamental building blocks of matter are particles     

Group: sci.physics.foundations · Group Profile · Search for Unitarity in sci.physics.foundations
Author: Oh No
Date: Aug 9, 2008 01:38

Thus spake Jay R. Yablon <jyablon@nycap.rr.com> Whereas the thread title is Unitarity of Time Evolution, what the above seems to show is the Non-Unitarity of Gravitation. Perhaps the question this raises, is how to obtain a basis for the non-unitary operators N(t,x,y,z). You are addressing one of the fundamental issues to do with the apparent incompatibility of quantum theory and general
Show full article (6.46Kb) · Show article thread
"Oh No" <NotI@charlesfrancis.wanadoo.co.uk> wrote in message news:ELnkI5Dc3tmIFwbK@charlesfrancis.wanadoo.co.uk... > Following (albeit tardily) the suggestion of Peter (to whom thanks), I > have revised the section on unitarily of U, to give a mathematical > proof > from conservation of the norm > > http://www.teleconnection.info/rqg/Evolution#ContinuityOfTimeEvolution > > > > Regards     

Group: sci.physics.foundations · Group Profile · Search for Unitarity in sci.physics.foundations
Author: Peter
Date: Aug 8, 2008 14:09

Thus spake Peter <enders@dekasges.de> Following (albeit tardily) the suggestion of Peter (to whom thanks), I have revised the section on unitarity of U, to give a mathematical proof from conservation of the norm http://www.teleconnection.info/rqg/Evolution#ContinuityOfTimeEvolution Looks better now :-) Further remarks: 1) "If the fundamental building blocks
Show full article (0.70Kb) · Show article thread
> Following (albeit tardily) the suggestion of Peter (to whom thanks), I > have revised the section on unitarity of U, to give a mathematical proof > from conservation of the norm > > http://www.teleconnection.info/rqg/Evolution#ContinuityOfTimeEvolution Looks better now :-) Further remarks: 1) "If the fundamental building blocks of matter are particles, then one would expect that     

Group: sci.physics.foundations · Group Profile · Search for Unitarity in sci.physics.foundations
Author: Oh No
Date: Aug 8, 2008 01:55

Following (albeit tardily) the suggestion of Peter (to whom thanks), I have revised the section on unitarity of U, to give a mathematical proof from conservation of the norm http://www.teleconnection.info/rqg/Evolution#ContinuityOfTimeEvolution Regards -- Charles Francis moderator sci.physics.foundations. charles (dot) e (dot) h (dot) francis (at) googlemail.com (remove spaces and
Show full article (1.86Kb) · Show article thread
Including our pocket universe. Hence signal nonlocality. All physical Hilbert spaces accessible in real experiments with real detectors are finite. Consequently the ODLRO emergence of new order demands that conservation of probability and unitarity of the physical S-matrix is an illusion. Suppose we have a quantum computer system described by a database state space of N qubits. This is     

Group: sci.physics.foundations · Group Profile · Search for Unitarity in sci.physics.foundations
Author: Jay R. Yablon
Date: Aug 7, 2008 12:35

Including our pocket universe. Hence signal nonlocality. All physical Hilbert spaces accessible in real experiments with real detectors are finite. Consequently the ODLRO emergence of new order demands that conservation of probability and unitarity of the physical S-matrix is an illusion. Suppose we have a quantum computer system described by a database state space of N qubits. This is
Show full article (3.23Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: sci.physics.foundations · Group Profile · Search for Unitarity in sci.physics.foundations
Author: Oh No
Date: Aug 7, 2008 12:25

Show full article (3.10Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: sci.physics.foundations · Group Profile · Search for Unitarity in sci.physics.foundations
Author: Peter
Date: Aug 7, 2008 10:22

Show full article (0.82Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: sci.physics.foundations · Group Profile · Search for Unitarity in sci.physics.foundations
Author: Oh No
Date: Aug 7, 2008 06:00

Show full article (0.45Kb)
    

Group: sci.physics.relativity · Group Profile · Search for Unitarity in sci.physics.relativity
Author: Jack Sarfatti
Date: Nov 29, 2006 18:26

Show full article (1.22Kb)
    

Group: sci.philosophy.tech · Group Profile · Search for Unitarity in sci.philosophy.tech
Author: Jack Sarfatti
Date: Nov 29, 2006 18:26

Show full article (1.22Kb)
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · next