Unflattened
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
 Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...
found 30 articles for 0.304 sec
Somethings I forgot to mention. First, I'm fairly new to Acrobat, so I'm not really sure what you're talking about. Second, I imported HTML code into Acrobat to get the form. Then I opened the form in LiveCycle because I didn't know how to get the email buttons and submit buttons on the page. So, I am working with a flattened PDF. I'm not sure if this make a difference or not, but it's a button     

Group: adobe.acrobat.scripting · Group Profile · Search for Unflattened in adobe.acrobat.scripting
Author: Patrick_Kuhl
Date: Sep 15, 2008 14:14

Hi,I spent weeks trying to sort it out. Apparently it's unavoidable. I read somewhere that the white lines wouldn't appear when printed but i saved one of the images as a jpg an the lines were clearly visible. Its because when the transparency in the image goes through the flattening process to enable printing it breaks the image into atomic regions and the white lines are the gaps in between.
Show full article (0.60Kb) · Show article thread
On 2008-06-30, Graham Reed (aka Bruce) was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea: > I'm with you on giving oncoming traffic an extra half-lane of > clearance on country roads. Or not-so-country two-lane roads. > > Or leaving lean-room on corners, I didn't realise (duh!) that lean room was required until I viewed footage from my helmetcam. Well, I thought I was leaving room - my     

Group: adobe.illustrator.windows · Group Profile · Search for Unflattened in adobe.illustrator.windows
Author: Calum_Paterson
Date: Aug 20, 2008 03:09

On Jun 2, 12:00 pm, Saysero <says...@gmail.com> wrote: Although electrons can act as waves it is not wrong to think of them as tiny balls of matter. Let us think of them that way. Since electrons are moving very fast the size of the electron that we can observe (although as far as I know we cannot see the electron) is smaller than its actual size (its size when it is not moving from
Show full article (0.87Kb) · Show article thread
[q][i]Originally posted by: [b][b]Newsgroup User[/b][/b][/i] > Oh sure, for the majority of artwork I totally agree. However, for > illustrations etc, that have yet to be approved by a client then being > able to > comp out your designs in this manner can be extremely useful. Another way > I > have used this is to test out UXD (User eXperience Design) for user > interfaces > that     

Group: alt.sysadmin.recovery · Group Profile · Search for Unflattened in alt.sysadmin.recovery
Author: TimC
Date: Jul 1, 2008 00:35

Oh sure, for the majority of artwork I totally agree. However, for illustrations etc, that have yet to be approved by a client then being able to comp out your designs in this manner can be extremely useful. Another way I have used this is to test out UXD (User eXperience Design) for user interfaces that are currently in development, which is something that Fireworks CS3
Show full article (1.10Kb) · Show article thread
"Don Pearce" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message news:47575585.614468546@news.plus.net > On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 08:20:54 -0500, "Arny Krueger" > <arnyk@hotpop.com> wrote: > >> "Don Pearce" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message >> news:47561862.598817921@news.plus.net >>> On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 19:01:17 -0500, "Arny Krueger" >>> <arnyk@hotpop.com> wrote: >>> >>>> "GregS" <zekfrivo@zekfrivolous.com     

Group: sci.physics · Group Profile · Search for Unflattened in sci.physics
Author: PD
Date: Jun 2, 2008 12:23

On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 08:20:54 -0500, "Arny Krueger" <arnyk@hotpop.com> wrote: "Don Pearce" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message news:47561862.598817921@news.plus.net On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 19:01:17 -0500, "Arny Krueger" <arnyk@hotpop.com> wrote: "GregS" <zekfrivo@zekfrivolous.com> wrote in message news:fj1qbc$1mh$1@usenet01.srv.cis.pitt.edu In article <5rj6tjF14kcbtU1@mid
Show full article (0.87Kb) · Show article thread
"Don Pearce" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message news:47561862.598817921@news.plus.net > On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 19:01:17 -0500, "Arny Krueger" > <arnyk@hotpop.com> wrote: > >> "GregS" <zekfrivo@zekfrivolous.com> wrote in message >> news:fj1qbc$1mh$1@usenet01.srv.cis.pitt.edu >>> In article <5rj6tjF14kcbtU1@mid.individual.net>, >>> "Richard Crowley" <rcrowley@xp7rt.net> wrote: >>>> "Arny Krueger"     

Group: macromedia.captivate.import · Group Profile · Search for Unflattened in macromedia.captivate.import
Author: macrofireball
Date: Mar 6, 2008 00:54

On Dec 3, 4:09 am, Hauke Reddmann <fc3a...@uni-hamburg.de> wrote: Excuse a complete noob's question: I do calculations with S matrices and need to convert the tensor form Sab_cd (which would be e.g. the nested list {{{{,},{,}},{{,},{,}}},{{{,},{,}},{{,},{,}}}} - I omitted variables a1-a16, since only the structure of the list, a 2*2*2*2 nest, is relevant) into a matrix Mab_cd
Show full article (0.93Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: macromedia.captivate.import · Group Profile · Search for Unflattened in macromedia.captivate.import
Author: Steve Howard **Community Expert** - eLearning + Mobile and Devices
Date: Mar 5, 2008 11:53

Show full article (0.81Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: rec.audio.tech · Group Profile · Search for Unflattened in rec.audio.tech
Author: Arny Krueger
Date: Dec 4, 2007 05:27

Show full article (2.94Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: rec.audio.tech · Group Profile · Search for Unflattened in rec.audio.tech
Author: Don Pearce
Date: Dec 4, 2007 05:26

Show full article (2.76Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: rec.audio.tech · Group Profile · Search for Unflattened in rec.audio.tech
Author: Arny Krueger
Date: Dec 4, 2007 05:20

Show full article (2.48Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: comp.softsys.math.mathematica · Group Profile · Search for Unflattened in comp.softsys.math.mathematica
Author: Ray Koopman
Date: Dec 4, 2007 01:34

Show full article (1.46Kb) · Show article thread
1 · 2 · 3 · next