Understoud
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

found 17 articles for 0.303 sec
On 5 Oct 2007 08:41:43 +0200, Mark South <mark.south@null.invalid> wrote: >On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 23:09:45 +0200, Manuel Otto wrote: > >> Some time ago, I was confused with which was a host, a host name, a >> domain, or a domain name. >> >> I thought I understoud after some reading that in 007.localhost.com >> 007 is the host, localhost.com the domain, and 007.localhost.com the >> domain name     

Group: alt.os.linux.slackware · Group Profile · Search for Understoud in alt.os.linux.slackware
Author: Manuel Otto
Date: Oct 5, 2007 08:37

On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 23:09:45 +0200, Manuel Otto wrote: Some time ago, I was confused with which was a host, a host name, a domain, or a domain name. I thought I understoud after some reading that in 007.localhost.com 007 is the host, localhost.com the domain, and 007.localhost.com the domain name (the confusion began when installing Slackware first time, and I configered network
Show full article (0.96Kb) · Show article thread
On Wed, 03 Oct 2007 02:46:46 +0200, Kees Theunissen <theuniss@rijnh.nl> wrote: >Manuel Otto wrote: > >> I send to my isp's dns server the list containing single domain >> localhost.com??? While that is not needed? It should not get more >> weird... > >No. You don't send the list to your isp's dns server. >But if a lookup fails you'll repeat the query with one of the >elements from your     

Group: alt.os.linux.slackware · Group Profile · Search for Understoud in alt.os.linux.slackware
Author: Mark South
Date: Oct 4, 2007 23:41

On Tue, 02 Oct 2007 16:57:48 -0800, floyd@apaflo.com (Floyd L. Davidson) wrote: Manuel Otto <not-for-mail@adress.is.invalid> wrote: On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 15:53:25 -0800, floyd@apaflo.com (Floyd L. Davidson) wrote: "The search list is normally determined from the local domain name; by default, it contains only the local domain name". I thought 'search' in resolv.conf, was an option
Show full article (0.66Kb) · Show article thread
On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 08:54:51 +0200, Henrik Carlqvist <Henrik.Carlqvist@deadspam.com> wrote: >Manuel Otto <not-for-mail@adress.is.invalid> wrote: >>> A P4 CPU is not as efficient per clockcycle as a PIII. As a rule of >>> thumb you can say that a 1 GHz PIII is about as fast as a 1.5 GHz P4. > >> Amazing! I always thought, or understoud, that for the same number of >> MHz's, a newer version     

Group: alt.os.linux.slackware · Group Profile · Search for Understoud in alt.os.linux.slackware
Author: Manuel Otto
Date: Oct 4, 2007 14:09

Manuel Otto <not-for-mail@adress.is.invalid> wrote: A P4 CPU is not as efficient per clockcycle as a PIII. As a rule of thumb you can say that a 1 GHz PIII is about as fast as a 1.5 GHz P4. Amazing! I always thought, or understoud, that for the same number of MHz's, a newer version of a CPU would be more effecient, not less? As you say, this is usually true because of new instructions
Show full article (4.02Kb) · Show article thread
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 20:41:57 +0200, Henrik Carlqvist <Henrik.Carlqvist@deadspam.com> wrote: >Manuel Otto <not-for-mail@adress.is.invalid> wrote: >> I never thought of my machine as an old machine, but now I see it is >> really not that young anymore... >> >> Still very happy with it though. > >Even though the machine is a few years old it isn't that bad when it comes >to performance. When     

Group: alt.os.linux.slackware · Group Profile · Search for Understoud in alt.os.linux.slackware
Author: Manuel Otto
Date: Oct 4, 2007 14:09

On Sat, 08 Sep 2007 01:54:10 GMT, Stanislaw Flatto <compaid@brownbear.com.au> wrote: Manuel Otto wrote: On 6 Sep 2007 18:15:40 GMT, et472@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Michael Black) wrote: Manuel Otto (not-for-mail@adress.is.invalid) writes: On 4 Sep 2007 20:55:26 GMT, et472@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Michael Black) wrote: Jim Diamond (Jim.Diamond@nospam.AcadiaU.ca
Show full article (17.47Kb) · Show article thread
Manuel Otto wrote: > On 6 Sep 2007 18:15:40 GMT, et472@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Michael Black) > wrote: > >> Manuel Otto (not-for-mail@adress.is.invalid) writes: >>> On 4 Sep 2007 20:55:26 GMT, et472@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Michael Black) >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Jim Diamond (Jim.Diamond@nospam.AcadiaU.ca) writes: >>>> >>>>> This lilo.conf works only while I am running 12.0, and have /dev/sda2 >>>     

Group: alt.os.linux.slackware · Group Profile · Search for Understoud in alt.os.linux.slackware
Author: Manuel Otto
Date: Sep 22, 2007 08:34

On Thu, 6 Sep 2007 20:26:03 -0300, Jim Diamond <Jim.Diamond@spamville.AcadiaU.ca> wrote: On 2007-09-06, Manuel Otto <not-for-mail@adress.is.invalid> wrote: On 6 Sep 2007 17:57:03 GMT, et472@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Michael Black) wrote: I was trying to explain something that didn't really seem clear to me before I started deliberately playing with lilo a few months ago.
Show full article (1.75Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.os.linux.slackware · Group Profile · Search for Understoud in alt.os.linux.slackware
Author: Henrik Carlqvist
Date: Sep 21, 2007 23:54

Show full article (1.62Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.os.linux.slackware · Group Profile · Search for Understoud in alt.os.linux.slackware
Author: Manuel Otto
Date: Sep 21, 2007 14:31

Show full article (3.60Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.os.linux.slackware · Group Profile · Search for Understoud in alt.os.linux.slackware
Author: Manuel Otto
Date: Sep 8, 2007 14:58

Show full article (11.47Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.os.linux.slackware · Group Profile · Search for Understoud in alt.os.linux.slackware
Author: Stanislaw Flatto
Date: Sep 7, 2007 18:54

Show full article (7.34Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.os.linux.slackware · Group Profile · Search for Understoud in alt.os.linux.slackware
Author: Manuel Otto
Date: Sep 6, 2007 18:12

Show full article (10.49Kb) · Show article thread
1 · 2 · next