... in a peer reviewed academic journal justifies the claim that it is a "proof".... UNTIL some peer reviewed rebuttal says otherwise..... half baked Internet claims that it isn't by uncredentialed amateurs like you count for NOTHING..... absolutely NOTHING. scientific or otherwise. But claiming to have "scientific proof" labels you as one who knows nothing about scientific method. [...

.... It doesn't prove that you know anything about science or about the internet, which is the area in which I called you an amateur. [Hammond] Yeah, yeah, yeah..... that's what all uncredentialed wannabees say. Just as downloading a program doesn't make you a programmer, having a degree doesn't make you a scientist - or an educated person. [Hammond] That isn't what the ...

... have found the id, ego and superego and it isn't in the bilateral brain but in the phylogenetic stages of evolution, [Hammond] You're a half ass molly coddled unpublished, uncredentialed boring amateur wannabee.... get the fuck outta here! My discovery of the Structural Model has been published in the PEER REVIEWED LITERATURE where it was peer reviewed by 5 professors of Psychology ...

... have found the id, ego and superego and it isn't in the bilateral brain but in the phylogenetic stages of evolution, [Hammond] You're a half ass molly coddled unpublished, uncredentialed boring amateur wannabee.... get the fuck outta here! My discovery of the Structural Model has been published in the PEER REVIEWED LITERATURE where it was peer reviewed by 5 professors of Psychology ...

...LESS COMPREHEND IT. but rather prefer to make "grandstand philaawsepy rants" and post hecklling to REAL QUALIFIED SCIENTISTS LIKE ME Take a hike... I don't argue "philaawsepy" with uncredentialed amateurs. You're known in the business as a "heckler".... .. stay off this thread. I'll simply add your name to my very long killfile list. ======================================== ...