...Feb 16, 5:11 pm, Publius <m.publ...@nospam.comcast.net> wrote: Ug <u...@ug.ug> wrote innews:l10bt2tnkap3jv9u8lb05qq71fvo1u30fl@4ax.com: ... That's the thing of it rc. People believe that. I believe they're dead...' of words that I've been noticing. For Ug, "random" means "uncaused," while for 1Z it means "...
...16, 5:11 pm, Publius <m.publ...@nospam.comcast.net> wrote: Ug <u...@ug.ug> wrote innews:l10bt2tnkap3jv9u8lb05qq71fvo1u30fl@4ax.com: ... That's the thing of it rc. People believe that. I believe they're dead ...maya' of words that I've been noticing. For Ug, "random" means "uncaused," while for 1Z it means "unpredictable...
...16, 5:11 pm, Publius <m.publ...@nospam.comcast.net> wrote: Ug <u...@ug.ug> wrote innews:l10bt2tnkap3jv9u8lb05qq71fvo1u30fl@4ax.com: ... That's the thing of it rc. People believe that. I believe they're dead wrong,...'maya' of words that I've been noticing. For Ug, "random" means "uncaused," while for 1Z it means "unpredictable."...
... 5:11 pm, Publius <m.publ...@nospam.comcast.net> wrote: Ug <u...@ug.ug> wrote innews:l10bt2tnkap3jv9u8lb05qq71fvo1u30fl@4ax.com: rc wrote...in arandomspot. That's the thing of it rc. People believe that. I believe they're dead wrong, that ... in the 'maya' of words that I've been noticing. For Ug, "random" means "uncaused," while for 1Z it means "unpredictable." Take that...
On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 07:25:16 -0600, Ug wrote (in article <7h0et21kbioe5ohdq5qoejofd2vvcgkcpk@4ax.com>): "1Z" <peterdjones@yahoo.com> wrote: On 16 Feb, 10:02, Ug <u...@ug.ug> wrote: rc wrote: If you are in Vegas playing Roulette,...in a random spot. That's the thing of it rc. People believe that. I believe they're dead wrong, that if you're...
On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 07:24:50 -0600, Ug wrote (in article <s9udt210fr6kltc1ab35hb146bj7e6n37a@4ax.com>): into your non-sequitur bucket. No, it fell in my, 'this guy likes to argue for the sake of argument, because he isn't really addressing the point' bucket. My non-sequitur bucket is reserved for when someone is at least attempting to use the rules of logic to argue. The word ...
Publius <m.publius@nospam.comcast.net> wrote: Ug <ug@ug.ug> wrote in news:l10bt2tnkap3jv9u8lb05qq71fvo1u30fl@4ax.com: rc wrote: ... lands in a random spot. That's the thing of it rc. People believe that. I believe they're dead wrong, that if you're in ... this argument fruitfully. Indeed that seems to be the case. Please see my reply to rc's post. -- Ug!
"1Z" <peterdjones@yahoo.com> wrote: On 16 Feb, 10:02, Ug <u...@ug.ug> wrote: rc wrote: If you are in Vegas playing Roulette, the ball lands in a random spot. That's the thing of it rc. People believe that. I believe they're dead wrong, that if you're in Vegas ... in a random spot. Believing it doesn't make it so. Disbelieving it doesn't make it false. -- Ug!
...@gmail.com> wrote: On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 04:02:23 -0600, Ug wrote (in article <l10bt2tnkap3jv9u8lb05qq71fvo1u30fl@4ax.com>): rc wrote: If ... in a random spot. That's the thing of it rc. People believe that. I believe they're dead wrong, that if you're in ..., because it is there that one can find the frail threads of what may lead to something useful. -- Ug!
Ug <ug@ug.ug> wrote in news:l10bt2tnkap3jv9u8lb05qq71fvo1u30fl@4ax.com: rc wrote: If you are in Vegas playing Roulette, the ball lands in a random spot. That's the thing of it rc. People believe that. I believe they're dead wrong, that if you're in Vegas playing Roulette, the ball does not, ever, land in a random...
