|
|
 |
| found 19 articles for 0.261 sec |
  |
Group: az.politics · Group Profile · Search for Ucrs in az.politics
Author: Billy
Date: May 16, 2011 12:53
In article <Pepster-830E91.18273615052011@news.giganews.com>, Pepe Le Jew <Pepster@zionet.com> wrote: In article <Wildbilly-7E4FB9.15174515052011@c-61-68-245-199.per.connect.net.au>, Billy <Wildbilly@withouta.net> wrote: In article <Pepster-50FCFF.08170115052011@news.giganews.com>, Peepee Le Foo <Peester@zionet.com> wrote: In article <Wildbilly-D51A53
|
| Show full article (4.96Kb) |
Group: talk.politics.misc · Group Profile · Search for Ucrs in talk.politics.misc
Author: Billy
Date: May 16, 2011 12:53
On 6/7/10 3:34 PM, NoEinstein wrote: About the time I decided to disprove Einstein (by invalidation of the M-M experiment and rubber rulers) There are USENET Posters that understand relativity theory and many that don't, including you. Relativity theory is self consistent and has no contradictions. In fact, there has yet to be an observation that contradicts a prediction
|
| Show full article (4.96Kb) |
Group: linux.debian.bugs.dist · Group Profile · Search for Ucrs in linux.debian.bugs.dist
Author: Don Armstrong
Date: Jun 7, 2010 11:50
On 5/13/10 12:52 PM, GogoJF wrote: On May 13, 12:37 pm, Sam Wormley<sworml...@gmail.com> wrote: On 5/13/10 10:49 AM, GogoJF wrote: ...in reality, light is instantaneous. But, we still believe light is finite. Since, we institute this finiteness when it comes to light, it doesn't matter whether we are moving towards or away from a light source, the delay will always
|
| Show full article (0.93Kb) |
|
|
|
1 ·
2 ·
next |
|
|
