Turnms
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

found 10 articles for 0.302 sec
Chak-ta = 4 - in Sanskrit, Mouk = a face in Khmer - Pali language. Khmer language is a mixture of Sanskrit and Pali words. On Jun 5, 8:30 am, "st. Mary' s Fucking Cunt hole" <veak...@gmail.com> wrote: > yes , it is true that Boudha was a philosopher , not a religious > preacher about God,. > > Boudhism was ,in the beginning , about a philosophy ,     

Group: soc.culture.australian · Group Profile · Search for Turnms in soc.culture.australian
Author: st. Mary' s Fucking Cunt hole
Date: Jun 4, 2007 19:07

yes , it is true that Boudha was a philosopher , not a religious preacher about God,. Boudhism was ,in the beginning , about a philosophy , a philosophy which examined the Human nature , and changes in life as one grew older, Boudhism was not about God, Buodhism was only a Philosophy . the early Boudhist followers did not worship an image of Boudha, the early
Show full article (6.83Kb)
Nospam wrote: > Les Cargill wrote: > > >>Sure, so long as they think they can make a buck on it. But it >>should be no surprise that we cannot follow a conversation >>between earnest government folks any more than we could follow a deep >>technical discussion between people of any other specialization. > > > First let us have online ALL the recording inside the FED, then we will see     

Group: soc.culture.australian · Group Profile · Search for Turnms in soc.culture.australian
Author: st. Mary' s Fucking Cunt hole
Date: Jun 4, 2007 18:30

Nospam wrote: Les Cargill wrote: Sure, so long as they think they can make a buck on it. But it should be no surprise that we cannot follow a conversation between earnest government folks any more than we could follow a deep technical discussion between people of any other specialization. First let us have online ALL the recording inside the FED, then we will see
Show full article (6.35Kb) · Show article thread
Les Cargill wrote: > Sure, so long as they think they can make a buck on it. But it > should be no surprise that we cannot follow a conversation > between earnest government folks any more than we could follow a deep > technical discussion between people of any other specialization. First let us have online ALL the recording inside the FED, then we will see who can or can not understand     

Group: us.politics · Group Profile · Search for Turnms in us.politics
Author: Les Cargill
Date: Oct 1, 2006 09:15

Les Cargill wrote: Sure, so long as they think they can make a buck on it. But it should be no surprise that we cannot follow a conversation between earnest government folks any more than we could follow a deep technical discussion between people of any other specialization. First let us have online ALL the recording inside the FED, then we will see who can or can not understand
Show full article (11.95Kb) · Show article thread
Nospam wrote: > Les Cargill wrote: > > >>Yes, but what about defects in the external control loop? We do >>have a few of those - the Fed, the "circuit breakers" on >>the Dow - but who watches the watchers? > > > Transparency should watch the watchers. Every single decision taken by the > Fed or Gov must be publically explained: > - what were the data taken in consideration > - the reasons     

Group: talk.politics.misc · Group Profile · Search for Turnms in talk.politics.misc
Author: Les Cargill
Date: Oct 1, 2006 09:15

Nospam wrote: Les Cargill wrote: Yes, but what about defects in the external control loop? We do have a few of those - the Fed, the "circuit breakers" on the Dow - but who watches the watchers? Transparency should watch the watchers. Every single decision taken by the Fed or Gov must be publically explained: - what were the data taken in consideration - the reasons
Show full article (11.95Kb) · Show article thread
RONCLARKSBURG@AOL.COM wrote: > Steve > > > Yes, I said we could have Done it, BUT, if your weak, Mook Mind > remembers, I also said thier was a good chance that the Israeli > Airforce would do it? Would you like me to pull up the post where you strapped on your air force knowledge and said we could bomb Iran's nuclear facilties out of existence even though people at the Pentagon said we     

Group: us.politics · Group Profile · Search for Turnms in us.politics
Author: Nospam
Date: Oct 1, 2006 07:58

Steve Yes, I said we could have Done it, BUT, if your weak, Mook Mind remembers, I also said thier was a good chance that the Israeli Airforce would do it? Hmm, Seems like in Lebanon, they Have No problem finding the Bad Folks and Targets and turnming them to Rubble? LOL Yes, we never expect a cowardly party like your to support any Ally and Yes, we know your side is all gonna cry over the
Show full article (6.20Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: talk.politics.misc · Group Profile · Search for Turnms in talk.politics.misc
Author: Nospam
Date: Oct 1, 2006 07:58

Show full article (6.20Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: us.politics · Group Profile · Search for Turnms in us.politics
Author: Les Cargill
Date: Sep 30, 2006 19:01

Show full article (4.05Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: talk.politics.misc · Group Profile · Search for Turnms in talk.politics.misc
Author: Les Cargill
Date: Sep 30, 2006 19:01

Show full article (4.05Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: misc.activism.militia · Group Profile · Search for Turnms in misc.activism.militia
Author: S. Olson
Date: Jul 16, 2006 09:27

Show full article (1.54Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: misc.activism.militia · Group Profile · Search for Turnms in misc.activism.militia
Author: RONCLARKSBURG
Date: Jul 16, 2006 05:29

Show full article (1.15Kb) · Show article thread