And why should there be only one way, one tool to write software? There is a place for a lot of tools and i really pray that there will be more than only the MS world and way. And btw. i used VFP for a long time now : they dropped it like the dropped a lot of other tools, not a bit troubled what happes to all - mostly business programms - written in it. They are just not trustfull - one

Robin Redeker wrote: On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 09:36:45PM -0700, David Schwartz wrote: I would be even more trustfull if someone of the openssl developers would say a word about this. Something like: 'Yes yes, the man pages are a bit obsolete, you can pass different buffers to SSL_read for retries.' And if there is a developer around able to do that I'm sure the community would much

However, in a strict local configuration like my testing environment the concept of trust is non relevant. I'm able to consider my CA and certifictae trustfull. And so the problem is only technical. Basically how to complete (technical) trust between both ? It depends upon the precise client software you are using. But pretty much every client implementation of SSL has some way