In article <g0c922$j9t$1@transam.sbcglobal.net>, dye <dye11@adsl-76-206-232-16.dsl.chcgil.sbcglobal.net> wrote: In article <XF_Vj.4134$5E4.3594@fe77.usenetserver.com>, FB <no.spam@will.be.allowed.com> wrote: "larkim" <matthew.larkin@gmail.com> wrote news:b878e752-d9d2-480e-80f0-3010dc26b078@d77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com... On May 12, 3:03 am, "FB" <no.s...@for.me.com> wrote: So
On Sun, 16 Mar 2008 15:36:49 -0600, "TroytheTroll" <f4_boy@hotmail.com> wrote: New Recap: 1. Troy finally had to abandon his argument that experts say I should have braked while doing that swerve. He had a small problem: Experts don't agree with him! I never abandoned any argument at all you half wit. I don't get it, does additional solar radiation in the
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:03:57 -0600, "TroytheTroll" <f4_boy@hotmail.com> wrote: You guys can't even READ, open your mouth and REPEAT what was said 27 words earlier. LOL! That, coming from the guy who claims Tim agrees with him, in spite of what Tim's said below: "I don't advocate braking at all while swerving." "I hope to never have to try to avoid someone intentionally trying to
>I have no problem with the asserionthat Don went from maximum braking to swerving, if indeed that was the assertion (given how many times you have flat out lied about what I have said in this thread, I can't be sure that you're not lying about what Don said). I am trying to decide if at 60mph its really swewrving, or basically initiating a turn, which after the impact with the pedestrian
