Graeme Wall wrote: Murder does require an intention to kill,,otherwise it's manslaughter. There is no such thing as attempted manslaughter. Haven's I seen somewhere that if you kill someone while commiting another crime such as robbery, it is always murder? The people who allegedly killed Mr Newlove in Warrington are being charged with murder, according to the press, although

"Walter Mann" <unsol@wjm.clara.net> wrote Thanks.. Yes, I think you summarise the position correctly - though I couldn't find that RGS 2013 deadline in the document you quoted the other day - which I think was the same one I quoted that gave the "private user only" description which I've asked them to elaborate on (presumably just an error in drafting which nobody at RSSB picked

"WZR" <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in message news:p9hkouoowyvx$.hkee2nj5qgx9$.dlg@40tude.net... On Sat, 12 May 2007 11:19:28 +0100, Walter Mann wrote: I note that nobody has clarified for me the question I raised last night about the legitimacy of a UWC on a public road.. I've now had a look at the Railway Standards document - GI/RT7011 - which is quoted here : http

"Chris Tolley" <cjt.7@supanet.com> wrote in message news:mn6ozve0x8xv$.ej2hr8wnisji$.dlg@40tude.net... The abundance of signs in the picture is neither here nor there. The crossing has gates, a stop sign and a red/green crossing control light on both sides. That is all it needs, according to the Highway Code . It is not up to us (you, me, her) to determine what is sufficient. The law