Tongue in cheek here
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
 Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...
found 11 articles for 0.588 sec
Nick Cramer wrote: > Helen Back <SiriusC-63@hotmail.co.uk> wrote: >> On 14 May, 03:41, Nick Cramer <n_cramerS...@pacbell.net> wrote: >>> Trinkwasser <s...@devnull.com.invalid> wrote: >>>> Nick Cramer <n_cramerS...@pacbell.net> wrote: >>>>> "W. Baker" <wba...@panix.com> wrote: >>>>>> [ . . . ] >>>>>> All I can say is that this "group" you so roundly condemn, were >>>>>> the people who enaabled     

Group: alt.support.diabetes · Group Profile · Search for Tongue in cheek here in alt.support.diabetes
Author: Ozgirl
Date: May 14, 2010 03:02

Helen Back <SiriusC-63@hotmail.co.uk> wrote: On 14 May, 03:41, Nick Cramer <n_cramerS...@pacbell.net> wrote: Trinkwasser <s...@devnull.com.invalid> wrote: Nick Cramer <n_cramerS...@pacbell.net> wrote: "W. Baker" <wba...@panix.com> wrote: [ . . . ] All I can say is that this "group" you so roundly condemn, were the people who enaabled me to gain quite
Show full article (1.59Kb) · Show article thread
On May 11, 9:14 am, PD <thedraperfam...@gmail.com> wrote: > PD never explains anything, he just CLAIMS that he already has. He's to lazy to explain his definition of MOMENTUM. Is a single sentence of SCIENCE too much to ask? — NE — > > On May 11, 7:30 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > On May 5, 11:43 am, PD <thedraperfam...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > PD:  Energy IN must     

Group: alt.support.diabetes · Group Profile · Search for Tongue in cheek here in alt.support.diabetes
Author: Nick Cramer
Date: May 14, 2010 02:54

On May 11, 9:14 am, PD <thedraperfam...@gmail.com> wrote: PD never explains anything, he just CLAIMS that he already has. He's to lazy to explain his definition of MOMENTUM. Is a single sentence of SCIENCE too much to ask? — NE — On May 11, 7:30 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote: On May 5, 11:43 am, PD <thedraperfam...@gmail.com> wrote: PD:  Energy IN must
Show full article (1.80Kb) · Show article thread
On 14 May, 03:41, Nick Cramer <n_cramerS...@pacbell.net> wrote: > Trinkwasser <s...@devnull.com.invalid> wrote: > > Nick Cramer <n_cramerS...@pacbell.net> wrote: > > >"W. Baker" <wba...@panix.com> wrote: > > >> [ . . . ] > > >> All I can say is that this "group" you so roundly condemn, were the > > >> people who enaabled me to gain quite excellent control over my > > >> diabetes. [excellent     

Group: sci.physics.relativity · Group Profile · Search for Tongue in cheek here in sci.physics.relativity
Author: NoEinstein
Date: May 14, 2010 01:27

TaniO <aobensam@earthlink.net> wrote: On Thu, 13 May 2010 22:41:16 -0400, Nick Cramer wrote Trinkwasser <spam@devnull.com.invalid> wrote: Nick Cramer <n_cramerSPAM@pacbell.net> wrote: "W. Baker" <wbaker@panix.com> wrote: [ . . . ] All I can say is that this "group" you so roundly condemn, were the people who enaabled me to gain quite excellent control over
Show full article (10.53Kb)
On Thu, 13 May 2010 22:41:16 -0400, Nick Cramer wrote (in article <20100513223939.817$0T@newsreader.com>): > Trinkwasser <spam@devnull.com.invalid> wrote: >> Nick Cramer <n_cramerSPAM@pacbell.net> wrote: >>> "W. Baker" <wbaker@panix.com> wrote: >>>> [ . . . ] >>>> All I can say is that this "group" you so roundly condemn, were the >>>> people who enaabled me to gain quite excellent control     

Group: sci.physics · Group Profile · Search for Tongue in cheek here in sci.physics
Author: NoEinstein
Date: May 14, 2010 01:27

Trinkwasser <spam@devnull.com.invalid> wrote: Nick Cramer <n_cramerSPAM@pacbell.net> wrote: "W. Baker" <wbaker@panix.com> wrote: [ . . . ] All I can say is that this "group" you so roundly condemn, were the people who enaabled me to gain quite excellent control over my diabetes. [excellent post snipped] I also feel that this "group" has helped me improve my control
Show full article (10.53Kb)
Andrew wrote: > > > "mower man" <nospam@f2s.com> wrote in message > news:38ednUSyWK_BjHbWnZ2dnUVZ8n-dnZ2d@pipex.net... >> Andrew wrote: >>> >>> >>> " Grant" <Grant@Mcleod40.fsnet.co.ku.com> wrote in message >>> news:X5CdnY4vEMtxu3TWnZ2dnUVZ8oWdnZ2d@pipex.net... >>>> >>>> "RzR" <2r4z0r2@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>> news:hsb7c7$qoj$1@ss408.t-com.hr... >>>>> CatharticF1 wrote     

Group: alt.support.diabetes · Group Profile · Search for Tongue in cheek here in alt.support.diabetes
Author: Helen Back
Date: May 14, 2010 01:08

Ok....from time to time my posties are a bit frivolous... nay, even full of nonserious. Some might say, "Flanier, you be barmy, childish, dizzy, empty-headed, facetious, featherbrained, flighty, flip, flippant, foolish, giddy, harebrained, idiotic, idle, ill-considered, impractical, juvenile, light, light-minded, minor, niggling, not serious, paltry, peripheral, petty, pointless, puerile, scatterbrained
Show full article (1.34Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.support.diabetes · Group Profile · Search for Tongue in cheek here in alt.support.diabetes
Author: Nick Cramer
Date: May 13, 2010 20:26

Show full article (1.84Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.support.diabetes · Group Profile · Search for Tongue in cheek here in alt.support.diabetes
Author: TaniO
Date: May 13, 2010 19:48

Show full article (1.35Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.support.diabetes · Group Profile · Search for Tongue in cheek here in alt.support.diabetes
Author: Nick Cramer
Date: May 13, 2010 19:39

Show full article (1.36Kb)
    

Group: rec.autos.sport.f1 · Group Profile · Search for Tongue in cheek here in rec.autos.sport.f1
Author: mower man
Date: May 13, 2010 17:07

Show full article (1.84Kb)
    

Group: alt.society.boomers · Group Profile · Search for Tongue in cheek here in alt.society.boomers
Author: flanier
Date: Jan 28, 2010 23:24

Show full article (3.06Kb)
1 · 2 · next