Received: from [74.34.15.27] by openbrick.kicks-ass.net (ArGoSoft Mail Server Pro for WinNT/2000/XP, Version 1.8 (1.8.6.0)); Sat, 10 Nov 2007 07:49:41 -0500 Received: from mx82.apexsc.com(HELO [95.178.212.221]) by apexsc.com (3.19.2) with XMSMTP id g2DKeBdo010997 for <amerigo256@adventure.com>; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 11:40:36 -0100 Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 14:45:36 +0200 From: "Approval Department"
An accompanying mail was sent to the following addresses which are thought to be responsible for domain(s), IP blocks, ASN, or nameservers associated with the origin point: No valid reporting addresses found Message abstract: Message ID: Originating IP address: 218.54.123.53 () ASN: 9318 ASN Description: Hanaro Telecom Inc. CIDR: 218.52.0.0/14 CIDR
An accompanying mail was sent to the following addresses which are thought to be responsible for domain(s), IP blocks, ASN, or nameservers associated with the origin point: cert@cert.br, mail-abuse@cert.br, abuse@noc.brasiltelecom.net.br Message abstract: Message ID: <2D6AA7EB.7000500@ashlee-allure.com> Originating IP address: 189.11.228.160 (189-11-228-160.gnace703
This junk came from: 82.79.54.40 => No reverse DNS 82.76.0.0 - 82.79.255.255 is assigned to rdsnet.ro (RO) 82.79.54.40 is listed at: CBL, SBL-ZEN:CBL+PBL, SpamCop rdsnet.ro is listed at RFC-Ignorant.org (abuse and postmaster) The spamvertized web host is: 1teenyurl.mobi => 221.1.220.82, No reverse DNS. 221.0.0.0 - 221.3.127.255 is assigned to cnc-noc.net CNCGROUP-SD (CN) 221.1.220
Morten Reistad wrote: Pat Farrell <pfarrell@pfarrell.com> wrote: It is current, but its not working very well. Its hard to write code for lots of slow processors. Extremely hard. There _are_ also a lot of applications where lots of semi-fast processors can deliver the juice; like some database stuff, web servers and media servers of all kinds, where you want to do the
