...:pan.2008.08.24.15.03.49@X.net... On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 11:00:20 -0700, greekgoddesses wrote: Time As An Emergent Phenomenon: Time is Clock. Length is Yardstick. Mass is Bathroom Scale. ZerkonX is Ranting Lunatic. Does anyone notice how the Yardstick doesn't require springs or gears :)???...

... in messagenews:pan.2008.08.24.15.03.49@X.net... On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 11:00:20 -0700, greekgoddesses wrote: Time As An Emergent Phenomenon: Time is Clock. Length is Yardstick. Mass is Bathroom Scale. ZerkonX is Ranting Lunatic. And Androcles is like testicles, without the mass or the yards of the ...

"ZerkonX" <Z@X.net> wrote in message news:pan.2008.08.24.15.03.49@X.net... On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 11:00:20 -0700, greekgoddesses wrote: Time As An Emergent Phenomenon: Time is Clock. Length is Yardstick. Mass is Bathroom Scale. ZerkonX is Ranting Lunatic.

... -0700, greekgoddesses wrote: Time As An Emergent Phenomenon: Time is Clock. ... order change. Change is the actual dimension. I think the reason sun time/change can not be accurately ...Both the earth and the sun move around a common center of force which itself is constantly moving, influenced by every other thing ... the galactic center which also moves. If 'gravity' can be applied ...

...a good mirror so PD can see how stupid he looks trying to make a case for his particle-light notions. You know, I can't stand PD. (He is very ignorant most of the time) But I don't ever remember him saying he supports particle-light theory and in fact I seem to think he supports wave theory and the silly constant speed of light to all crap that you also subscribe to....

... are a good mirror so PD can see how stupid he looks trying to make a case for his particle-light notions. You know, I can't stand PD. (He is very ignorant most of the time) But I don't ever remember him saying he supports particle-light theory and in fact I seem to think he supports wave theory and the silly constant speed of light to all crap that you also subscribe to. Do you ...

...this, that it involves an argument in a circle: a mass moves without acceleration if it is sufficiently far from other bodies; we... far from other bodies only by the fact that it moves without acceleration. > http://www.mathpages.com/rr/s4-07/4-07.htm... second.. and such data comes in faster than a second if moving towards the source.. So. Try to learn some physics Sue, instead ...

... weakness of the principle of inertia lies in this, that it involves an argument in a circle: a mass moves without acceleration if it is sufficiently far from other bodies; we know that it is sufficiently far from other bodies only by the fact that it moves without acceleration. > http://www.mathpages.com/rr/s4-07/4-07.htm Poor Sue, can not grasp ...

...> I can't think about your silly 1 second of light because you have to use funny clocks, rubber rulers non-existant particles and absurd mathematics. Actually, I am using a single standard of time and a single standard of distance so even your thoughts of what I am using is flawed beyond repair. And I am not even using particles. I am actually using waves and wavelengths in my 1 ...

...? << Problems with emission theory The simplest form of emission theory says that radiating objects throw off light with a speed of "c" relative to their own state of motion, and (unless we have reason to believe that the light changes speed in flight), we then expect light to be moving towards us with a speed that is offset by the speed of the distant emitter (c