Thoughts on Prop 8
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
 Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...
found 2315 articles for 1.015 sec
dsl@sprynet.com (Dennis Lewis) wrote in news:48b737af.4884793@news.west.earthlink.net: > Speaking of the marriage amendment fights, I'm sure progressives > in Arizona and California have checked as to whether Cindy > McCain's beer franchises have contributed to the campaigns in > either state. If Cindy's business interests are backing Prop 8 or > its equivalent in Arizona, surely the gay bars     

Group: soc.motss · Group Profile · Search for Thoughts on Prop 8 in soc.motss
Author: David W. Fenton
Date: Aug 29, 2008 14:17

On 24 Dec 2008, "Nixon.D" <nixon.d@comcast.net> wrote: No society in recorded history has officially decreed that two people of the same sex have the right to official "marriage" and the rights/privileges thereof. Even the heathen Chinee, the TowelHeads, and the AfricanBushFolk know that....... It is easy to concoct especially such time-bound/culture-bound "just so" stories especially
Show full article (0.79Kb)
On 24 Dec 2008, "Nixon.D" <nixon.d@comcast.net> wrote: > No society in recorded history has officially decreed > that two people of the same sex have the right to > official "marriage" and the rights/privileges thereof. > Even the heathen Chinee, the TowelHeads, and the > AfricanBushFolk know that....... It is easy to concoct especially such time-bound/culture-bound "just so" stories especially     

Group: soc.retirement · Group Profile · Search for Thoughts on Prop 8 in soc.retirement
Author: nospam
Date: Dec 24, 2008 07:27

Gary Eickmeier wrote: You forgot the one about the children. Children are actual future human beings, entitled to have a mother and a father. To INSTITUTIONALIZE a type of family that deprives them of that would be wrong. Okay... Only non-married folks may serve in the Military. Happy? Oh, what's that? You're just fine with an institution that deprives children of their parents
Show full article (7.53Kb)
"Gary Eickmeier" <geickmei@tampabay.rr.com> writes: > As a general rule, it is easier for a man and a woman to have a child than > it is for a man and a man. This may be why marriage has traditionally been > between a man and a woman throughout recorded history. Gee. Excluding marriages between very wealthy individuals for political reseasons, social-status reasons, the desire of the family     

Group: soc.senior.issues · Group Profile · Search for Thoughts on Prop 8 in soc.senior.issues
Author: nospam
Date: Dec 24, 2008 07:27

Gary Eickmeier wrote: "Dionisio" <moc.rr.thighisni@5ellimd.com> wrote: Gary Eickmeier wrote: Gay marriage would INSTITUTIONALIZE the procreation of bastard children. If gays can't have kids, how can they have bastards? I would LOVE to sit in on a gay couple's explanation of the birds and the bees to their children. I see a dodge. So, here's the question again: If gays can't
Show full article (7.53Kb)
Gary Eickmeier wrote: > FACT: Gay couples require a third party to reproduce. So? If that's bad, let's kill all the fertility docs. > FACT: Marriage is an institution for the procreation and nurturing of > children in families of their natural parents. Adoption must chafe your loins. > FACT: Gays cannot have children. There seems to be something of a supply glut. Why cheapen human     

Group: soc.motss · Group Profile · Search for Thoughts on Prop 8 in soc.motss
Author: ProfQ
Date: Sep 21, 2008 12:59

Gary Eickmeier wrote: Gay marriage would INSTITUTIONALIZE the procreation of bastard children. If gays can't have kids, how can they have bastards? Hmm...? -- And the Thought of the Moment (TM) is: Suppose you went to a priest and asked for help and -- since the gentleman was a Christian priest -- you were referred to the Bible. If you went next to a physician for help and
Show full article (0.32Kb) · Show article thread
On Aug 13, 7:37 pm, "Gary Eickmeier" <geick...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > "Anlatt the Builder" <tirh...@aol.com> wrote in messagenews:443a86ee-0b47-4cd2-8331-39dfa01c03f9@a3g2000prm.googlegroups.com... > > Well, at least you are returning to your original argument, although > it was demolished several posts ago. If you can find somewhere in this > thread where I suggested that people have babies     

Group: alt.politics.usa · Group Profile · Search for Thoughts on Prop 8 in alt.politics.usa
Author: Dionisio
Date: Aug 17, 2008 08:52

Show full article (0.64Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.politics.usa · Group Profile · Search for Thoughts on Prop 8 in alt.politics.usa
Author: No One
Date: Aug 15, 2008 17:59

Show full article (0.66Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.politics.usa · Group Profile · Search for Thoughts on Prop 8 in alt.politics.usa
Author: Dionisio
Date: Aug 14, 2008 18:11

Show full article (0.75Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.politics.usa · Group Profile · Search for Thoughts on Prop 8 in alt.politics.usa
Author: Dionisio
Date: Aug 14, 2008 18:09

Show full article (1.16Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.politics.usa · Group Profile · Search for Thoughts on Prop 8 in alt.politics.usa
Author: Dionisio
Date: Aug 13, 2008 22:13

Show full article (0.53Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.politics.usa · Group Profile · Search for Thoughts on Prop 8 in alt.politics.usa
Author: Anlatt the Builder
Date: Aug 13, 2008 21:01

Show full article (8.99Kb) · Show article thread
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · next