... and actions. That's fallacy of post hoc, propter hoc. To be credible, one would expect your theory to be able to predict, beforehand, some thoughts that the alcohol will make me thinkd. For example: Somewhere that night I might think about, say, free will. Can you predict whether I'll do that or not? By what method? To observe, one need not predict. If you ...

...drunk thoughts and actions. That's fallacy of post hoc, propter hoc. To be credible, one would expect your theory to be able to predict, beforehand, some thoughts that the alcohol will make me thinkd. For example: Somewhere that night I might think about, say, free will. Can you predict whether I'll do that or not? By what method? To observe, one need not predict. Observe for ...

... And then you'll tell me that those thoughts were caused by the alcohol. That's fallacy of post hoc, propter hoc. To be credible, one would expect your theory to be able to predict, beforehand, some thoughts that the alcohol will make me thinkd. For example: Somewhere that night I might think about, say, free will. Can you predict whether I'll do that or not? By what method?