I think this video settles the issue once and for all. See if you don't agree. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ql6VqZDiC6s Robert Harris

I think this video settles the issue once and for all. See if you don't agree. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ql6VqZDiC6s Robert Harris

I think this video settles the issue once and for all. See if you don't agree. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ql6VqZDiC6s Robert Harris

... almost be acceptable if the bulk of the other witnesses corroborated a missed shot at frame 160. But, as we shall see, they do not. Far ... I think motivated by two things, first to see if I could see where the shot came from, see if I could see anything unusual; but equally but more ... evidence he was hit long before Zapruder frame 285. This is a critical blow to the pet theory of ...

...inches to the right of JFK at frame 285? Look at this video: I know that. Have for 20 years. If a shot came ...feet to the right of Tague. Again, I am NOT disputing that shots came from the Dal-Tex building, just ...prove a SBT when there is NO need to? We admit there were more than three shots and more than one shooter, so I am perplexed as to your cause here. And YES...

... more sense that the "shrapnel" was from a missed, early shot that struck the pavement to JFK's right, which explains ... is NOT possible. NONE. I don't care what angle the shot(s) came from. But you should. That information is incredibly important, especially... to the right of JFK at frame 285? Look at this video: I know that. Have for 20 years. If a shot came...

...JFK spun sharply to his right and shielded his fact at frame 193, and why Kellerman heard him say,...hit". More nonsense. NONE. I don't care what angle the shot(s) came from. But you should. That information is incredibly important, especially..., passes just inches to the right of JFK at frame 285? Look at this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?...

...JFK spun sharply to his right and shielded his fact at frame 193, and why Kellerman heard him say,...hit". More nonsense. NONE. I don't care what angle the shot(s) came from. But you should. That information is incredibly important, especially..., passes just inches to the right of JFK at frame 285? Look at this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?...

.../p37567074.html This is Nix 120 and appears to be the same frame that was printed in *Four Days* on page 21. ... Legs* or *Yellow Slacks* or whatever anyone wants to call her. If you go some frames back it becomes apparent that she was standing far closer ...> Robert Harris is listing evidence you can't refute about a shot at Z-285 - but he's simply lied about close eyewitnesses ("...

...> Robert Harris is listing evidence you can't refute about a shot at Z-285 - but he's simply lied about close eyewitnesses ("roughly adjacent") ... too far back. What part of the grass is "too far back?" Well, we've posted all the frames for you. Looks like you're off on a tangent here again. No Tim... the entire topic is ...