... Another good example of what I have called "the wheel of indoctrination" . . . that is, the tendency for information falsely passing as "knowledge" to...be propagated through the official channels of education (indoctrination) and into the general public. Because ..., the pharma and biotech industries set the wheel in motion by "encouraging" those who ...
... Another good example of what I have called "the wheel of indoctrination" . . . that is, the tendency for information falsely passing as "knowledge" to...be propagated through the official channels of education (indoctrination) and into the general public. Because ..., the pharma and biotech industries set the wheel in motion by "encouraging" those who ...
...> wrote: Another good example of what I have called "the wheel of indoctrination" . . . that is, the tendency for information falsely passing as "knowledge" to be propagated through the official channels of education (indoctrination) and into the general public. Because ..., the pharma and biotech industries set the wheel in motion by "encouraging" those who run ...
Another good example of what I have called "the wheel of indoctrination" . . . that is, the tendency for information falsely passing as "knowledge" to be propagated through the official channels of education (indoctrination) and into the general public. Because this "... case, the pharma and biotech industries set the wheel in motion by "encouraging" those who run the "...
pico wrote: Mercury is the 2nd most toxic substance on earth, and amalgams contain roughly 50%% mercury. My statement is accurate. The siver-mercury amalgam is not mercury when it's set in the tooth. Utter BLASPHEMY to the Mercury Militia!
ta wrote: On Oct 28, 8:52 pm, wri...@l1000.prodigy.net (David Wright) wrote: In article <1193252974.747340.313...@t8g2000prg.googlegroups.com>, ta <padl...@nc.rr.com> wrote: On Oct 24, 2:35 pm, trigonometry1...@gmail.com wrote: While the general point seems pretty well true, to call mercury amalgam the 2nd most toxic substance is rather inaccurate. If ...
wright@l1000.prodigy.net (David Wright) wrote: In article <1193621108.687764.258480@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com>, ta <padlrnc@nc.rr.com> wrote: On Oct 28, 8:52 pm, wri...@l1000.prodigy.net (David Wright) wrote: In article <1193252974.747340.313...@t8g2000prg.googlegroups.com>, ta <padl...@nc.rr.com> wrote: On Oct 24, 2:35 pm, trigonometry1...@gmail.com wrote: ...
ta <padlrnc@nc.rr.com> wrote: If you carefully read my post, you'll notice I didn't say that *mercury amalgam* was the 2nd most toxic substance on earth. I said we're still putting the 2nd most toxic substance on earth in people's fillings. See the difference? Anyone who uses the idiotic expression "mercury amalgam" is demonstrating ignorance. Please try to use words which mean ...
In article <1193621108.687764.258480@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com>, ta <padlrnc@nc.rr.com> wrote: On Oct 28, 8:52 pm, wri...@l1000.prodigy.net (David Wright) wrote: In article <1193252974.747340.313...@t8g2000prg.googlegroups.com>, ta <padl...@nc.rr.com> wrote: On Oct 24, 2:35 pm, trigonometry1...@gmail.com wrote: While the general point seems pretty well true, ...
On Oct 28, 8:52 pm, wri...@l1000.prodigy.net (David Wright) wrote: In article <1193252974.747340.313...@t8g2000prg.googlegroups.com>, ta <padl...@nc.rr.com> wrote: On Oct 24, 2:35 pm, trigonometry1...@gmail.com wrote: While the general point seems pretty well true, to call mercury amalgam the 2nd most toxic substance is rather inaccurate. If you carefully ...
