google3luo359@yahoo.com wrote: Not to take anything away from Nadal, because he played a superb match, but there was a reason why the score was so one-sided. It was a combination of great playing by Nadal and very poor playing by Federer. For most of the match Federer was trying to force the play. Everyone knows you can't do that on clay. Before several balls were even served,
On Jun 9, 12:31 am, "Dr. GroundAxe" <ground...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote: google3luo...@yahoo.com wrote: Not to take anything away from Nadal, because he played a superb match, but there was a reason why the score was so one-sided. It was a combination of great playing by Nadal and very poor playing by Federer. For most of the match Federer was trying to force the play
On 8 Jun, 23:28, google3luo...@yahoo.com wrote: Not to take anything away from Nadal, because he played a superb match, but there was a reason why the score was so one-sided. It was a combination of great playing by Nadal and very poor playing by Federer. For most of the match Federer was trying to force the play. Everyone knows you can't do that on clay. Before several
Not to take anything away from Nadal, because he played a superb match, but there was a reason why the score was so one-sided. It was a combination of great playing by Nadal and very poor playing by Federer. For most of the match Federer was trying to force the play. Everyone knows you can't do that on clay. Before several balls were even served, Fed had already made his mind up he was
In article <fjc4go$hnm$3@aioe.org>, William Grosvenor <intergroup@grosvenor.net> wrote: They're coming to take me away, HA HA Yes, indeed they are. http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/people/g/grosvenor-william http://groups.google.ca/groups?q=grosvenor+faq For Grosvenor Relief, contact abuse@shaw.ca, and include full headers from his articles, most of which violate Shaw's Acceptable Use Policy
