...time ago). Very nice and friendly piece of software, unfortunately a little on the expensive side (maybe things changed now, although I somehow doubt it). But I do not see how tecplot even compares ...for development, then I'd use the GINO or similar route I think. I can't imagine doing the things used to do the way used to--been there, done that, didn't even get a tee-shirt! ...
...my choice these days... I've used tecplot in the past, version 8 (I think; was a long time ago). Very nice and friendly piece of software, unfortunately a little on the expensive side (maybe things changed now, although I somehow doubt it). But I do not see how tecplot even compares to plotting inside fortran. Aside the tecplot sdk which I see on their web, I cannot get tecplto plots ...
I am sultry tramp who loves teasing you and making you beg for release. The only thing you have to remember is I have 5 simple rules if you want to play with ME. 1. Fuck Who I ... a girl like me 4. Its always about Me 5. Remember tiny dicked are meant to be cuckolds, but sometimes average sized guys are too So pick up your phone and give me a call if you dare... Caitlin 1.800.570.7660...
...on data 2. Try a step size. For integer data I try 1...to next lower multiple of step size. Round max up to next higher...tick mark labels that the step size would require. If too many (>...back to step 2 to try the next step size. One other thing to consider. Do ... and 10 DO I=1,size(table) if(table(I).ge.... factor ENDDO DO I=I,size(table) TX=table(I)*P ...
...And that part is even a Fortran-specific question, so you ger "credit" for being on topic after all. :-) See such things as anint. You have to scale as needed to get the appropriate rounding, but that's trivially doable. How to do things like rounding has come up here more than once, with several answers. Anint is one (or just plain aint, as ...
... compilers that do so. The above "if the user expects..." makes your statement true, but that's a significant qualification. More fundamental is that intrinsics may be used for some things where user procedures are not allowed - notably in initialization expressions ... It's useful to be reminded of other aspects of Fortran intrinsics even if they don't relate to the question "...
OK, the pointer involved is m_pFont. If I call SafeRelease in function SetFontLarge this creates an immediate problem. If I just go ahead and call D3DX10CreateFont in SetFontLarge things work but the program eventually crashes due to the memory leak. So, I understand what you are saying about it being a pointer problem, but what is the correct way to associate a new font with the ...
...compilers that do so. The above "if the user expects..." makes your statement true, but that's a significant qualification. More fundamental is that intrinsics may be used for some things where user procedures are not allowed - notably in initialization expressions. Initialization expressions are designed to be doable at compile time (even though the standard doesn't use thsoe words). --...
... to follow without formal definitions of the terms. In most language semantics discussions, an operator is just syntactic sugar for a function application. And function notation can be sugar (or pepper?) for things I for one think of as operators, e.g. SQRT() ABS() CMPLX(X,Y). Or my probably all-time unfavorite, PL/I's SUBSTR(). But the formal difference is that operator symbols ...
... think I would have for those things that are potentially useful in Fortran.... If you want the Fortran size of something, you use the ...of bytes). Storage_size also gives the size of a scalar of the ... essence, it gives you the size of the type, even though ... do something like storage_size(variable)*size(variable)/8 (or a little ... the possibility of non-byte sizes). Long ago, I think it ...
