Sound of Trumpet wrote: http://www.markshea.blogspot.com/2007_10_01_archive.html#6117678051030146021 The Last of the Darwinian Racists [snip] Hey, Horny. I have one word for you: *PLONK!* AP

...210450@v23g2000prn.googlegroups.com>, Sound of Trumpet <sound_of_trumpet@HotPOP.com> wrote: The Last of the Darwinian Racists <pretending to accept the above premise> What ever will you do? Once the "Last of the Darwinian Racists" is gone, you certainly cannot call the remaining Darwinians racists, can you? Talk about painting yourself into a ...

...2007_10_01_archive.html#6117678051030146021 The Last of the Darwinian Racists James Watson has always struck me a sort.... No loving Creator was involved, just the random accident of matter and...the escutcheon of the Truly Scientific Racist of the 19th Century, it is... most of his assumptions: they just don't like his conclusions.... of God". That will work just so long as the sloganeers ...

Jasper Janssen wrote: You mean, 'not very'? Before the slave trade really got started, a Moor wasn't ipso facto an inferior creature. Just Foreign and thus to be distrusted. http://www.fordham.edu/HALSALL/ancient/juv-sat2eng.html "Let the straight-legged man laugh at the club-footed, the white man at the blackamoor: but who could endure the Gracchi railing at sedition?" ...

..., though. They like to leap on allegedly "Christian" scientists of the past, exhuming them and making them dance, but they seem to ignore how prevalent such attitudes were around the times of, oh, Galileo or Newton... You mean, 'not very'? Before the slave trade really got started, a Moor wasn't ipso facto an inferior creature. Just Foreign and thus to be distrusted. Jasper

Mark K. Bilbo wrote: Why can't you people just say, "I don't understand the theory"? Same reason they can't say "I don't know" about all the things they are so sure of. Any answer is better than that.

..., they are also palpable idiots..." - H. L. Mencken TOE has so many holes in it, it should be amputated. Ken Why can't you people just say, "I don't understand the theory"? -- Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423 EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion ------------------------------------------------------------ "The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the ...

On Oct 21, 2:54 am, James A. Donald <jam...@echeque.com> wrote: On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 22:52:11 -0700, "Mike Schilling" "Darwinian" is used by scientists much as "Newtonian" and "Gaililean" are used. "Darwinist" and "Darwinism" are not, any more than "Einsteinist" or "Galileanism" are. Here is Richard Dawkins on page one of "the selfish gene" : "...

...pagan religion than by scientists. So maybe they define the word. ??????????? The words "Darwinism" and "Darwinian"is extensively used by scientists, much as "Newtonian", and "Galilean" are used. It ...proven false, and any way Darwin did not say what Darwinists think he said, and only racists and nazis believe it, because Darwin did not say what he said, and any way what...

On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 15:58:59 -0700, "Mike Schilling" <mscottschilling@hotmail.com> wrote: James A. Donald wrote: "Mike Schilling" "Darwinian" is used by scientists much as "Newtonian" and "Gaililean" are used. "Darwinist" and "Darwinism" are not, any more than "Einsteinist" or "Galileanism" are. Try: <http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/search?src=hw&...