The F22 ISN T for sale Re Vale the Nighthawk
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

found 15 articles for 0.006 sec
Re: The F22 ISN'T for sale! Re: Vale the Nighthawk     

Group: aus.aviation · Group Profile · Search for The F22 ISN T for sale Re Vale the Nighthawk in aus.aviation
Author: Addinall
Date: Mar 25, 2008 02:59

....26638$421.22...@news-server.bigpond.net.au>, notha...@dontwantany.com writes... It's worth noting the Japs are even interested in the Super Hornet. Also, they recognise the F22 doesn't have the same sort of maritime strike capability that we need. Its worth noting the Japs are undertaking a comprehensive and competitive evaluation process before ...
Show full article (13.85Kb) · Show article thread
Re: The F22 ISN'T for sale! Re: Vale the Nighthawk     

Group: aus.aviation · Group Profile · Search for The F22 ISN T for sale Re Vale the Nighthawk in aus.aviation
Author: David Moss
Date: Mar 24, 2008 15:33

...$421.22759@news-server.bigpond.net.au>, nothanks@dontwantany.com writes... It's worth noting the Japs are even interested in the Super Hornet. Also, they recognise the F22 doesn't have the same sort of maritime strike capability that we need. Its worth noting the Japs are undertaking a comprehensive and competitive evaluation process before making a...
Show full article (0.98Kb) · Show article thread
Re: The F22 ISN'T for sale! Re: Vale the Nighthawk     

Group: aus.aviation · Group Profile · Search for The F22 ISN T for sale Re Vale the Nighthawk in aus.aviation
Author: Praetorian
Date: Mar 21, 2008 23:34

....26638$421.22759@news-server.bigpond.net.au>, nothanks@dontwantany.com writes... It's worth noting the Japs are even interested in the Super Hornet. Also, they recognise the F22 doesn't have the same sort of maritime strike capability that we need. Its worth noting the Japs are undertaking a comprehensive and competitive evaluation process before making a decision to...
Show full article (0.79Kb) · Show article thread
Re: The F22 ISN'T for sale! Re: Vale the Nighthawk     

Group: aus.aviation · Group Profile · Search for The F22 ISN T for sale Re Vale the Nighthawk in aus.aviation
Author: David Moss
Date: Mar 21, 2008 17:38

...<R_nDj.26638$421.22759@news-server.bigpond.net.au>, nothanks@dontwantany.com writes... It's worth noting the Japs are even interested in the Super Hornet. Also, they recognise the F22 doesn't have the same sort of maritime strike capability that we need. Its worth noting the Japs are undertaking a comprehensive and competitive evaluation process before making a decision to ...
Show full article (0.41Kb) · Show article thread
Re: The F22 ISN'T for sale! Re: Vale the Nighthawk     

Group: aus.aviation · Group Profile · Search for The F22 ISN T for sale Re Vale the Nighthawk in aus.aviation
Author: Kwyjibo
Date: Mar 16, 2008 23:34

...net.au... For those who keep harping about an airframe that isn't available to us..... It's worth noting the Japs are even interested in the Super Hornet. Also, they recognise the F22 doesn't have the same sort of maritime strike capability that...Embassy in Japan who has been party to talks on the potential sale of the Typhoon told Jane's in late February that he...
Show full article (1.39Kb) · Show article thread
The F22 ISN'T for sale! Re: Vale the Nighthawk     

Group: aus.aviation · Group Profile · Search for The F22 ISN T for sale Re Vale the Nighthawk in aus.aviation
Author: Praetorian
Date: Mar 16, 2008 23:14

For those who keep harping about an airframe that isn't available to us..... It's worth noting the ... in the Super Hornet. Also, they recognise the F22 doesn't have the same sort of maritime strike... has been party to talks on the potential sale of the Typhoon told Jane's in late ... now on maintaining momentum in the Typhoon export sales effort. BAE Systems has been examining options for ...
Show full article (2.86Kb) · Show article thread
Re: The F22 ISN'T for sale! Re: Vale the Nighthawk     

Group: aus.aviation · Group Profile · Search for The F22 ISN T for sale Re Vale the Nighthawk in aus.aviation
Author: Addinall
Date: Mar 29, 2008 05:31

On Mar 28, 1:52В pm, "Praetorian" <notha...@dontwantany.com> wrote: "Away--pits" <spamlis...@gmail.com> wrote in message news:3711d623-0917-43e1-935b-4db082c74f83@s19g2000prg.googlegroups.com... On Mar 27, 2:11 pm, "Praetorian" <notha...@dontwantany.com> wrote: "Paul Saccani" <sacc...@omen.net.au> wrote in message news:g5oju3dd36njjeloirgfsr1f89vl89rd4c@...
Show full article (1.62Kb) · Show article thread
Re: The F22 ISN'T for sale! Re: Vale the Nighthawk     

Group: aus.aviation · Group Profile · Search for The F22 ISN T for sale Re Vale the Nighthawk in aus.aviation
Author: Praetorian
Date: Mar 27, 2008 20:52

"Away--pits" <spamlister@gmail.com> wrote in message news:3711d623-0917-43e1-935b-4db082c74f83@s19g2000prg.googlegroups.com... On Mar 27, 2:11 pm, "Praetorian" <notha...@dontwantany.com> wrote: "Paul Saccani" <sacc...@omen.net.au> wrote in message news:g5oju3dd36njjeloirgfsr1f89vl89rd4c@4ax.com... On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 02:59:38 -0700 (PDT), Addinall <addin...@...
Show full article (1.17Kb) · Show article thread
Re: The F22 ISN'T for sale! Re: Vale the Nighthawk     

Group: aus.aviation · Group Profile · Search for The F22 ISN T for sale Re Vale the Nighthawk in aus.aviation
Author: Away--pits
Date: Mar 27, 2008 02:15

On Mar 27, 2:11 pm, "Praetorian" <notha...@dontwantany.com> wrote: "Paul Saccani" <sacc...@omen.net.au> wrote in message news:g5oju3dd36njjeloirgfsr1f89vl89rd4c@4ax.com... On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 02:59:38 -0700 (PDT), Addinall <addin...@addinall.org> wrote: The US Army has spent a billion updating the A-10 Why? The USAF should pay for that. Maybe it's a ...
Show full article (0.84Kb) · Show article thread
Re: The F22 ISN'T for sale! Re: Vale the Nighthawk     

Group: aus.aviation · Group Profile · Search for The F22 ISN T for sale Re Vale the Nighthawk in aus.aviation
Author: Praetorian
Date: Mar 26, 2008 22:11

"Paul Saccani" <saccani@omen.net.au> wrote in message news:g5oju3dd36njjeloirgfsr1f89vl89rd4c@4ax.com... On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 02:59:38 -0700 (PDT), Addinall <addinall@addinall.org> wrote: The US Army has spent a billion updating the A-10 Why? The USAF should pay for that. Maybe it's a typical media stuff-up. Or maybe the US Army really did pay for upgrades to the most ...
Show full article (0.58Kb) · Show article thread
1 · 2 · next