Terriblem
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
 Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...
found 5 articles for 0.302 sec
roadblocks? MS Access was handicapped -- about a decade ago. They sit there and prompt us 'are you _SURE_ you trust Access'-- i mean why do we get asked 3 times if we trust a database? Excel Spreadsheets are the real danger. Why can we email Excel but not MS Access? Seriously It didn't _JUST_ get handicapped from a security standpoint. It happened in about 2000-2001. -Aaron     

Group: microsoft.public.access · Group Profile · Search for Terriblem in microsoft.public.access
Author: a a r o n _ k e m p f
Date: Jul 1, 2008 23:05

I'm not so sure I agree with 'Access 2000 = worst'. I think that Access 97 was the worst-- because it didn't include ADP. I supported 20-30 people entering stuff in Access 97 for years. It was awfully slow. -Aaron On Jun 30, 1:37 pm, "Larry Linson" <boun...@localhost.not> wrote: The end of Access has been predicted with a great deal of regularity since it was first released
Show full article (2.52Kb) · Show article thread
The end of Access has been predicted with a great deal of regularity since it was first released in late 1992 -- can't possibly compete with Paradox, no longer supports <some feature only the complainer ever used>, and such. Just FYI, when first released, Access 2000 was (arguably) the worst-ever release, though many of us give the edge in the worst-release contest to Access 95 (after all, A95     

Group: microsoft.public.access · Group Profile · Search for Terriblem in microsoft.public.access
Author: a a r o n _ k e m p f
Date: Jul 1, 2008 23:03

Given that you brought up that monstrostity that MS thinks is a good idea... Is it just me or are there others out there that wonder if MS ever heard of the Dvorak keyboard? "Chris O'C via AccessMonster.com" wrote: If you think each new version of Access only changes its look, you should read the "What's new!" section of each new version of Access for a list of new features. The
Show full article (1.93Kb) · Show article thread
An accompanying mail was sent to the following addresses which are thought to be responsible for domain(s), IP blocks, ASN, or nameservers associated with the origin point: abuse@jsinfo.net chinafriends Message abstract: Message ID: <ZUIAEZ446.9ATL7EDXI.F0000b4a1@semiramis.coma.com> Originating IP address: 222.93.217.37 () ASN: 4134 ASN Description: China Telecom     

Group: microsoft.public.access · Group Profile · Search for Terriblem in microsoft.public.access
Author: Larry Linson
Date: Jun 30, 2008 13:37

Show full article (1.54Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: microsoft.public.access · Group Profile · Search for Terriblem in microsoft.public.access
Author: dch3
Date: Jun 30, 2008 11:42

Show full article (2.32Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: news.admin.net-abuse.sightings · Group Profile · Search for Terriblem in news.admin.net-abuse.sightings
Author: Chris
Date: Jul 8, 2006 20:02

Show full article (17.30Kb)