Teasely
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
 Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...
found 280 articles for 0.412 sec
See, there's a difference. When you spank the monkey... it's nobody's business; you are hurting no one. But when you tease the monkey, you are playing with his brain, a form of torture, making him believe something it is not true and confusing him. Take for example the fact that bicycles are vehicles and yet they are totally ignored on the roads. They better say, "WE DON'T WANT BICYCLES ON     

Group: alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent · Group Profile · Search for Teasely in alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent
Author: His Highness the TibetanMonkey, Creator of the Movement of Tantra-Hammock
Date: Jun 7, 2010 13:59

See, there's a difference. When you spank the monkey... it's nobody's business; you are hurting no one. But when you tease the monkey, you are playing with his brain, a form of torture, making him believe something it is not true and confusing him. Take for example the fact that bicycles are vehicles and yet they are totally ignored on the roads. They better say, "WE DON'T WANT BICYCLES ON
Show full article (0.83Kb)
See, there's a difference. When you spank the monkey... it's nobody's business; you are hurting no one. But when you tease the monkey, you are playing with his brain, a form of torture, making him believe something it is not true and confusing him. Take for example the fact that bicycles are vehicles and yet they are totally ignored on the roads. They better say, "WE DON'T WANT BICYCLES ON     

Group: rec.bicycles.soc · Group Profile · Search for Teasely in rec.bicycles.soc
Author: His Highness the TibetanMonkey, Creator of the Movement of Tantra-Hammock
Date: Jun 7, 2010 13:59

See, there's a difference. When you spank the monkey... it's nobody's business; you are hurting no one. But when you tease the monkey, you are playing with his brain, a form of torture, making him believe something it is not true and confusing him. Take for example the fact that bicycles are vehicles and yet they are totally ignored on the roads. They better say, "WE DON'T WANT BICYCLES ON
Show full article (0.83Kb)
On 7/7/2011 2:05 PM, Sarah Ehrett wrote: > On Thu, 07 Jul 2011 13:00:30 -0700, Sanders > <bucky@Use-Author-Supplied-Address.invalid> wrote: > >> On 7/7/2011 8:53 AM, Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>> On Thu, 07 Jul 2011 07:23:17 -0700, Sanders >>> <bucky@Use-Author-Supplied-Address.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> On 7/7/2011 12:42 AM, dave brooker wrote: >>>>> "Sanders"<bucky@Use-Author-Supplied-Address     

Group: rec.bicycles.misc · Group Profile · Search for Teasely in rec.bicycles.misc
Author: His Highness the TibetanMonkey, Creator of the Movement of Tantra-Hammock
Date: Jun 7, 2010 13:59

On May 3, 11:32 pm, Carolina Reb <walt.hamp...@att.net> wrote: On May 3, 8:51 pm, LIBERATOR <markz...@ymail.com> wrote: On May 3, 9:37 pm, NEMO <brianlambsbig...@excite.com> wrote: LIBERATOR, you're a shadow! Well you still haven't explained a "dead man walking". I wish you would. It's just bullshit. Well, that most movies are dedicated and directed at me
Show full article (0.83Kb)
"Mitchell Jones" <mjones@21cenlogic.com> wrote: Re: Why GPS Atomic Clocks Run More Slowly Before Launch > "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> wrote: >> > hanson wrote: http://tinyurl.com/Einstein-Dingleberries wherein it says: GPS was in operation LONG before Einstein Dingleberries came along to echo a tortured description, in 39 Ashby steps, to arrive at the 38 microsec, which are gleaned, for this     

Group: uk.rec.cycling · Group Profile · Search for Teasely in uk.rec.cycling
Author: His Highness the TibetanMonkey, Creator of the Movement of Tantra-Hammock
Date: Jun 7, 2010 13:59

"Mitchell Jones" <mjones@21cenlogic.com> wrote: Re: Why GPS Atomic Clocks Run More Slowly Before Launch "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> wrote: hanson wrote: http://tinyurl.com/Einstein-Dingleberries wherein it says: GPS was in operation LONG before Einstein Dingleberries came along to echo a tortured description, in 39 Ashby steps, to arrive at the 38 microsec, which are gleaned, for this
Show full article (0.83Kb)
On Jun 8, 8:57 am, Ye Epopt Yclept <x...@woc.org.com> wrote: > Appledog wrote: > > On Jun 6, 10:25 pm, "Lee Frank" <original...@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> "Appledog" <oliver.rich...@gmail.com> wrote in message > > >>news:0e0eac84-1ded-4eef-b015-8230e22b6459@z15g2000prh.googlegroups.com... > >> On Jun 6, 10:06 pm, "Lee Frank" <original...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > >>> "niunian" <niun...@ymail.com> wrote     

Group: az.general · Group Profile · Search for Teasely in az.general
Author: Sanders
Date: Jul 7, 2011 19:59

Show full article (1.49Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: rec.aviation.military · Group Profile · Search for Teasely in rec.aviation.military
Author: LIBERATOR
Date: May 3, 2011 22:36

Show full article (1.28Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk · Group Profile · Search for Teasely in alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk
Author: Tim Bruening
Date: Jun 8, 2010 00:50

Show full article (0.16Kb)
    

Group: sci.physics.relativity · Group Profile · Search for Teasely in sci.physics.relativity
Author: hanson
Date: Jun 7, 2010 23:27

Show full article (5.40Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: sci.physics · Group Profile · Search for Teasely in sci.physics
Author: hanson
Date: Jun 7, 2010 23:27

Show full article (5.40Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.zen · Group Profile · Search for Teasely in alt.zen
Author: Appledog
Date: Jun 7, 2010 21:47

Show full article (3.99Kb) · Show article thread
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · next