Taylorc
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
 Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...
found 134 articles for 0.304 sec
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 07:16:06 -0700 (PDT), Robatoy <Counterfitter@gmail.com> wrote: >Robert.... I can see how you drew that conclusion from Lew's post... >but I think Lew's post is a hypothetical one. >I read and re-read it, and it almost reads in a third person kinda >way. He is pointing out that the Bubbas are often racist, I don't see >how that makes him racist. Robert didn't call Lew     

Group: rec.woodworking · Group Profile · Search for Taylorc in rec.woodworking
Author: Chuck Taylor
Date: Sep 16, 2008 10:02

On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 11:40:21 -0500, Smash <smash@adams.com> wrote: Chuck Taylor wrote: Evidently as long as you aren't speeding as you ignore a red light, that's okay too. Traffic signals are rarely appropriately timed to allow the intersection to clear; in Atlanta, just forget about the intersection clearing. Safety first -- you may be able to stop and make the light. What
Show full article (0.61Kb) · Show article thread
On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 08:56:53 -0500, Smash <smash@adams.com> wrote: >Barry wrote: >> I'd have to think that if someone stole our highways, someone would surely >> have seen who did it. Where did they put them? >> Barry >> >> > >Why, from those narsty evil speeders is who! Because we don't care if >you do under the speed limit in the left-hand lane, just as long as >you're not speeding     

Group: hsv.general · Group Profile · Search for Taylorc in hsv.general
Author: Chuck Taylor
Date: Aug 30, 2008 11:20

On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 10:45:57 -0500, "pritsy" <pritsy@comcast.net> wrote: Maybe if you see someone else's view of the subject you can start to see the big picture instead of 'straining at gnats'. Try http://www.boomantribune.com/story/2008/8/14/144158/668 Fine. So another person has leapt to the same conclusion as you, which is that this crime was motivated by political ideology and
Show full article (0.80Kb) · Show article thread
On Aug 15, 7:18 am, Chuck Taylor <chuck.tay...@spamtrap.org> wrote: > On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 20:15:17 -0500, "pritsy" <pri...@comcast.net> > wrote: > > >Chuck Taylor wrote: > >> Yet without shame or hesitation, you chose to spin this fresh murder > >> into supporting evidence for your ongoing argument (complete with a > >> gleeful "Hi there, Storch [sic]!"). > > >Repeated from the message that     

Group: hsv.general · Group Profile · Search for Taylorc in hsv.general
Author: Chuck Taylor
Date: Aug 23, 2008 15:45

On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 20:15:17 -0500, "pritsy" <pritsy@comcast.net> wrote: Chuck Taylor wrote: Yet without shame or hesitation, you chose to spin this fresh murder into supporting evidence for your ongoing argument (complete with a gleeful "Hi there, Storch [sic]!"). Repeated from the message that you are responding to: "Did you understand that this thread is a continuation
Show full article (0.55Kb) · Show article thread
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:00:52 -0500, "pritsy" <pritsy@comcast.net> wrote: >So you think there is no such thing as inflammatory talk. Riiiiiiight. Sure, that's what I said. Here, let me be direct, just so you understand what I really did say. At this moment, you DO NOT KNOW what the killer's motivation was, whether it had anything to do with politics, or whether he'd ever paid attention     

Group: hsv.general · Group Profile · Search for Taylorc in hsv.general
Author: Chuck Taylor
Date: Aug 16, 2008 15:10

On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 07:28:46 GMT, "Rev. Bob 'Bob' Crispen" <revbob@the.rectory> wrote: What's the name of the man who was killed this time? Do you know? Right now. Don't google. What was his name? We pretty much know all we need to know, don't we? An excellent point. I noticed that the OP never mentioned Bill Gwatney by name but made sure to mention Ann Coulter, both by
Show full article (1.83Kb) · Show article thread
On Sat, 02 Aug 2008 15:28:50 -0500, Joe User <axyz@yahoo.com> wrote: >On Sat, 02 Aug 2008 13:35:34 -0500, Chuck Taylor wrote: > >> If I read it right, this process separates water into hydrogen and oxygen >> without converting said solar energy into electricity. If it can be put >> into production and made more efficient than solar-powered electrolysis, >> then it's a good thing. > >From     

Group: hsv.general · Group Profile · Search for Taylorc in hsv.general
Author: dninsafbicia
Date: Aug 16, 2008 05:40

On Sat, 02 Aug 2008 09:54:54 -0500, Joe User <axyz@yahoo.com> wrote: On Sat, 02 Aug 2008 02:30:49 +0000, Rev. Bob 'Bob' Crispen wrote: Sorry, that's *when* the sun doesn't shine. A cheap, non-toxic solar cell process announced at MIT. This is being promoted as a solar energy innovation, but it has nothing to do with solar energy. Solar energy is marketable, right now, so that
Show full article (1.60Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: hsv.general · Group Profile · Search for Taylorc in hsv.general
Author: Chuck Taylor
Date: Aug 15, 2008 05:18

Show full article (1.08Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: hsv.general · Group Profile · Search for Taylorc in hsv.general
Author: Chuck Taylor
Date: Aug 14, 2008 15:17

Show full article (1.31Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: hsv.general · Group Profile · Search for Taylorc in hsv.general
Author: Chuck Taylor
Date: Aug 14, 2008 10:08

Show full article (0.66Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: hsv.general · Group Profile · Search for Taylorc in hsv.general
Author: Chuck Taylor
Date: Aug 2, 2008 14:27

Show full article (0.90Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: hsv.general · Group Profile · Search for Taylorc in hsv.general
Author: Chuck Taylor
Date: Aug 2, 2008 11:35

Show full article (1.03Kb) · Show article thread
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · next