TVRO
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
 Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...
found 118 articles for 0.304 sec
On Apr 22, 11:56 pm, Felix Miata <UgaddaBkidding.due2...@dev.nul> wrote: > On 2008/04/23 06:51 (GMT) u...@domain.invalid apparently typed: > > > What happens to TVRO in the clear, and 4DTV next Feb, when things go all > > digital? Anything? Everything? > > Absolutely no impact/effect/change. The 2009 Feb change to digital is all > about terrestrial broadcasting.https://www.dtv2009.gov/AboutProgram     

Group: rec.video.satellite.tvro · Group Profile · Search for TVRO in rec.video.satellite.tvro
Author: tonycynor
Date: Apr 25, 2008 08:23

Felix Miata wrote: On 2008/04/23 06:51 (GMT) user@domain.invalid apparently typed: What happens to TVRO in the clear, and 4DTV next Feb, when things go all digital? Anything? Everything? Absolutely no impact/effect/change. The 2009 Feb change to digital is all about terrestrial broadcasting. https://www.dtv2009.gov/AboutProgram.aspx Felix, How are the Denver and Prime
Show full article (0.82Kb) · Show article thread
On 2008/04/23 06:51 (GMT) user@domain.invalid apparently typed: > What happens to TVRO in the clear, and 4DTV next Feb, when things go all > digital? Anything? Everything? Absolutely no impact/effect/change. The 2009 Feb change to digital is all about terrestrial broadcasting. https://www.dtv2009.gov/AboutProgram.aspx -- "Either the constitution controls the judges, or the judges rewrite     

Group: rec.video.satellite.tvro · Group Profile · Search for TVRO in rec.video.satellite.tvro
Author: UCLAN
Date: Apr 23, 2008 11:11

Alan wrote: In article <f6v9sh$tva$1@gnus01.u.washington.edu> "Max Power" <mikehack@u.washington.edu> writes: For short term fixes, yes -- it would seem probable that what I am suggesting would provide substandard latitude and longitude information. HOWEVER, most TVRO receivers (especially DSS, or DTH) are fixed ... and it would be assumed that fix information would be
Show full article (0.35Kb) · Show article thread
In article <f6v9sh$tva$1@gnus01.u.washington.edu> "Max Power" <mikehack@u.washington.edu> writes: > >For short term fixes, yes -- it would seem probable that what I am >suggesting would provide substandard latitude and longitude information. > >HOWEVER, most TVRO receivers (especially DSS, or DTH) are fixed ... and it >would be assumed that fix information would be average out not just over     

Group: rec.video.satellite.tvro · Group Profile · Search for TVRO in rec.video.satellite.tvro
Author: Paultry
Date: Apr 23, 2008 07:16

For short term fixes, yes -- it would seem probable that what I am suggesting would provide substandard latitude and longitude information. HOWEVER, most TVRO receivers (especially DSS, or DTH) are fixed ... and it would be assumed that fix information would be average out not just over minutes but hours to days. Accuracy to within ~30m would be what I would expect for 15 min fixes, but
Show full article (0.85Kb) · Show article thread
In article <f4fg6g$4vf$1@gnus01.u.washington.edu> "Max Power" <mikehack@u.washington.edu> writes: >It probably would be a good idea for TVRO: a low complexity GNSS signal at >the top or bottom end of the Ku / Ka band... > >Probable bandwidth: 100 kHz, but 200 kHz would about right >-- Note: 200 kHz --> ~1.2 mbs, NICAM uses 100 kHz and runs at 768 kbs >Signaling rate: same as GPS L1 >Signaling     

Group: rec.video.satellite.tvro · Group Profile · Search for TVRO in rec.video.satellite.tvro
Author: Felix Miata
Date: Apr 22, 2008 23:56

Max Power wrote: Problems associated with this idea: -- TVRO / DSS sats would have to have GNSS transmission systems built in, and this would require a slight engineering rethink of TVRO transponders. This would make the difference between satellites providing only "bent pipe" services (i.e. they're just a bunch of transponders) and them becoming the source of certain signals. That's
Show full article (0.51Kb) · Show article thread
It probably would be a good idea for TVRO: a low complexity GNSS signal at the top or bottom end of the Ku / Ka band... Probable bandwidth: 100 kHz, but 200 kHz would about right -- Note: 200 kHz --> ~1.2 mbs, NICAM uses 100 kHz and runs at 768 kbs Signaling rate: same as GPS L1 Signaling datasream: a modified GPS L1 more suitable for TVRO GNSS -- Note: no selective access datastream as with     

Group: alt.tv.tech.hdtv · Group Profile · Search for TVRO in alt.tv.tech.hdtv
Author: Dale DePriest
Date: Jul 11, 2007 09:18

Show full article (1.80Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.tv.tech.hdtv · Group Profile · Search for TVRO in alt.tv.tech.hdtv
Author: Alan
Date: Jul 11, 2007 08:09

Show full article (1.19Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.tv.tech.hdtv · Group Profile · Search for TVRO in alt.tv.tech.hdtv
Author: Max Power
Date: Jul 9, 2007 23:44

Show full article (1.35Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.tv.tech.hdtv · Group Profile · Search for TVRO in alt.tv.tech.hdtv
Author: Alan
Date: Jun 10, 2007 20:56

Show full article (0.93Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.tv.tech.hdtv · Group Profile · Search for TVRO in alt.tv.tech.hdtv
Author: Jan Ceuleers
Date: Jun 10, 2007 01:36

Show full article (0.45Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.tv.tech.hdtv · Group Profile · Search for TVRO in alt.tv.tech.hdtv
Author: Max Power
Date: Jun 9, 2007 17:15

Show full article (0.85Kb)
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · next