... objects. The term 'numbers', 'a number', 'all' numbers, etc., are arithmetically inadmissable, even if they are grammatically par for the course. Symbols are symbols. They only ever symbolise the true nature of the observer. We are each 'multifaceted, so we project a categorising nature, to first see our reflection. This is what Pythagoras was all about. Of course the symbols ...

... citronnier », a expliqué Mme Guerda Prévilon, ajoutant que des produits réalisés à partir du recyclage de matériels non dégradables, des fruits du pays et de la peinture et objets d’art symbolisant la production nationale seront mis également en valeur tout le long de la marche. A Port-au-Prince, un rassemblement des jeunes est prévu à compter de 7h30 AM au local de la Maison des jeunes ...

... the brussels school has favored their own dynamic epistemic logic which has many nice features here in paradox recovery) everything we can discuss everything that has ever been or ever will be symbolised is only a posteriori meaningful in the context of the interpretations used (in decisions) the postmodernists got a lot right here but except for thom and prigogine and only a ...

.... "The Buddhist term for "instant" is the ksana, which also means "the favorable moment". Any instant may become the ksana; illumination is instantaneous (eka-ksana) and usually symbolised as a lighting flash. Thus the difference between "moment" and ksana is qualitative. The ksana is coexistant with every instant of time past-present-future. By jumping into ksana from the ...

... Buddhism. "The Buddhist term for "instant" is the ksana, which also means "the favorable moment". Any instant may become the ksana; illumination is instantaneous (eka-ksana) and usually symbolised as a lighting flash. Thus the difference between "moment" and ksana is qualitative. The ksana is coexistant with every instant of time past-present-future. By jumping into ksana from ...

... Buddhism. "The Buddhist term for "instant" is the ksana, which also means "the favorable moment". Any instant may become the ksana; illumination is instantaneous (eka-ksana) and usually symbolised as a lighting flash. Thus the difference between "moment" and ksana is qualitative. The ksana is coexistant with every instant of time past-present-future. By jumping into ksana from ...

... this in Buddhism. "The Buddhist term for "instant" is the ksana, which also means "the favorable moment". Any instant may become the ksana; illumination is instantaneous (eka-ksana) and usually symbolised as a lighting flash. Thus the difference between "moment" and ksana is qualitative. The ksana is coexistant with every instant of time past-present-future. By jumping into ksana from the ...

... holding a knife pointed back towards Bartholomew indicating his nature. Judas (See) is looking at Christ to synchronise the bread grabbing, while holding a bag of goodies, symbolising the excessive dominance of vision. Judas betrays Christ since we usually believe what we see, not what we can not see. Thomas (Hear) leans over James (Smell) to listen...

..., while holding a knife pointed back towards Bartholomew indicating his nature. Judas (See) is looking at Christ to synchronise the bread grabbing, while holding a bag of goodies, symbolising the excessive dominance of vision. Judas betrays Christ since we usually believe what we see, not what we can not see. Thomas (Hear) leans over James (Smell) to ...

..., while holding a knife pointed back towards Bartholomew indicating his nature. Judas (See) is looking at Christ to synchronise the bread grabbing, while holding a bag of goodies, symbolising the excessive dominance of vision. Judas betrays Christ since we usually believe what we see, not what we can not see. Thomas (Hear) leans over James (Smell) to listen to ...