"marc" <initial.surname@btinternet.com> wrote in message news:LcadnZ_cCuyTatvanZ2dnUVZ8sWhnZ2d@bt.com... My solicitor told me of another client of hers, stay at home father/high flying mother, split, father asked by family court judge " Why aren't you supportign your family?" There is this perception that a stay at home dad is a lazy sponger who forces his spouse to work, whereas

GrandmasterB was thinking very hard : "Uwe Raabe" <ur@nospam.org> wrote in message news:46961c9f@newsgroups.borland.com... I cannot see the benefit of removing WITH from the language. If you don't like it - don't use it! I think the big problem with that approach is that the people who are 'impacted' by the use of 'with' are not necessarily the people who use it. Its the