************************************************************** JobCircle.com is a regional job board serving all industries and occupations in the PA, NJ, DE, NY, MD, and DC areas. We offer a regional job board, online learning, and regional job fair events for jobseekers who live in our areas of focus. To Learn More: Job Board: http://www.JobCircle.com?source=ng eLearning
My home computer is running at 1024 x 768, and I have a 1.5m/256kbs link. Yes, technically the clip is not HDTV -- but it seemed like HDTV on my home computer. -- Don't consider Mono Audio a sin, it has its place. -- 256 x 650 is still close to or better than PAL (in one of its diminsions) Sadly, I don't work for any of the evil American Imprealist entities like DirecTV. HDTV is viable
My home computer is running at 1024 x 768, and I have a 1.5m/256kbs link. Yes, technically the clip is not HDTV -- but it seemed like HDTV on my home computer. -- Don't consider Mono Audio a sin, it has its place. -- 256 x 650 is still close to or better than PAL (in one of its diminsions) Sadly, I don't work for any of the evil American Imprealist entities like DirecTV. HDTV is viable
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 23:19:21 -0700, Max Power wrote: HDTV is viable at 256kbs and 512kbs, just not DVB-HDTV that is... http://abc.net.au/science/crude/ I was superised that even at 256 kbs, it seemed like 768 kbs HDTV. Naturally, 512 kbs was an improvement. As long as one is willing to abandon any kind of DVB compatibility, put up with a variable framerate -- and other off
HDTV is viable at 256kbs and 512kbs, just not DVB-HDTV that is... http://abc.net.au/science/crude/ I was superised that even at 256 kbs, it seemed like 768 kbs HDTV. Naturally, 512 kbs was an improvement. As long as one is willing to abandon any kind of DVB compatibility, put up with a variable framerate -- and other off line computer file coding annoyances ... HDTV under 340kbs is actually