On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 20:02:09 +0100, performingchimp wrote: David Haggett wrote: On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 02:07:55 +0100, performingchimp wrote: I have a gig next week in London town with Mike Berk: Details: Jon Gomm www.jongomm.com www.youtube.com/jongomm www.myspace.com/jongomm Michael Berk www.michaelberk.com www.myspace.com/michaelberkacoustic
On Fri, 8 Aug 2008 07:44:39 -0700 (PDT), A.Steenveld@sb.umcn.nl wrote: Fooling around with the 'FOR /F ...' command I observed some strange behaviour. My original task/idea was to itereate trough %%PATH%% and check each member in the ';' seperated list of PATH for a specific one. I need to pusch out some directories. For so far the 'FOR ...' command does not seem to be up
On 3-Mar-2008, pnin <timofey_pnin@yahoo.com> wrote: DoD wrote: From the day in 2005 that Israel pulled its troops from Gaza and evacuated the 7,000 Jews who would have been slaughtered in the absence of military protection by their genocidal Palestinian neighbors, Hamas began firing rockets into Israeli towns and schoolyards with the intention of killing as many Jews
On Jun 18, 6:39 am, Geoff <gj...@gmail.com> wrote: [snip] When I studied philosophy of science; growth in understanding was described as paradigms. One could not see what was in the next paradigm due to the constraints of the current paradigm. Todays scientific paradigm may be excluding some areas of knowledge. The post-modernist in me agrees with you, in suggetsing that the paradigm
