... we spoke Of many things Fools and kings This he said to me "The greatest thing You'll ever learn Is just to love and Be loved in return Maybe theres an objective envy? It's a shame that we subjectivly **move** "along" Death obviously sucks since it seems to have little place in the subjective. Burrows into the back of our (su)objectives. nagging away. /late

...? What I mean when I ask this is, what makes you sure that your statment here is true? Is it objectivly true, does it count for eveybody? Or is it something that you subjectivly belive, do you belive it should count for everybody? I want to have a billion dollars, therefore I believe I have a billion dollars. This is the usual assinine and ...

... to person, your statement looks to me to be a denial of Kants subjective reasoning, but an objective denial. You said '...that is pathetic' I want to clarify if you mean this objectivly, or subjectivly. Or can you show me an objective reason for thinking this, or is it your subjective belief? Wether I have any knowledge of Kant is irrelavanet, it is you, and your words that I have ...

...? What I mean when I ask this is, what makes you sure that your statment here is true? Is it objectivly true, does it count for eveybody? Or is it something that you subjectivly belive, do you belive it should count for everybody? I want to have a billion dollars, therefore I believe I have a billion dollars. This is the usual assinine and fallacious ...

... not? What I mean when I ask this is, what makes you sure that your statment here is true? Is it objectivly true, does it count for eveybody? Or is it something that you subjectivly belive, do you belive it should count for everybody? I want to have a billion dollars, therefore I believe I have a billion dollars. Do you consider this to be a valid method ...

...? What I mean when I ask this is, what makes you sure that your statment here is true? Is it objectivly true, does it count for eveybody? Or is it something that you subjectivly belive, do you belive it should count for everybody? I want to have a billion dollars, therefore I believe I have a billion dollars. Do you consider this to be a valid method of ...

...? What I mean when I ask this is, what makes you sure that your statment here is true? Is it objectivly true, does it count for eveybody? Or is it something that you subjectivly belive, do you belive it should count for everybody? I want to have a billion dollars, therefore I believe I have a billion dollars. Do you consider this to be a valid method of thinking? Do you...

... truth. Why not? What I mean when I ask this is, what makes you sure that your statment here is true? Is it objectivly true, does it count for eveybody? Or is it something that you subjectivly belive, do you belive it should count for everybody? If Kant was comfatable with this admision, them can we prove it to be wrong of him? Could we prove it to be to him? Again I bring you'...

lee@rdfmedia.com wrote: love can be proved, but only subjectivly. Oh so YOUR definition of love, quote *chemicals slosshing around in our brains noticably oxytocin and vasopression, and being picked up by receptors in our limbic system and our brain stem that was responsible for feelings of emotional attachment* quote unquote, is only subjective crap is it leeeeeee? FFS what a ...

lee@rdfmedia.com wrote: love can be proved, but only subjectivly. Oh so YOUR definition of love, quote *chemicals slosshing around in our brains noticably oxytocin and vasopression, and being picked up by receptors in our limbic system and our brain stem that was responsible for feelings of emotional attachment* quote unquote, is only subjective crap is it leeeeeee? FFS what a ...