On Aug 23, 10:37 am, "Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com" <tttppp...@yahoo.com> wrote: On Aug 22, 1:16 pm, Mariano Suárez-Alvarez <mariano.suarezalva...@gmail.com> wrote: On Aug 22, 9:49 am, "Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com" <tttppp...@yahoo.com> wrote: On Aug 12, 4:23 pm, Mariano Suárez-Alvarez <mariano.suarezalva...@gmail.com> wrote: On
On Aug 22, 1:16 pm, Mariano Suárez-Alvarez <mariano.suarezalva...@gmail.com> wrote: On Aug 22, 9:49 am, "Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com" <tttppp...@yahoo.com> wrote: On Aug 12, 4:23 pm, Mariano Suárez-Alvarez <mariano.suarezalva...@gmail.com> wrote: On Aug 12, 4:30 pm, "Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com" <tttppp...@yahoo.com> wrote: On Aug
The multiplication rules for the seven non-scalar Octonion basis units are best described by seven permutations, any of which when combined with the scalar basis unit form a quaternion subalgebra. I would like to use the short-hand notation (ijk) to imply the permutation basis unit multiplication rules for i,j,k not equal to each other and not equal to 0 ui * uj = uk uj * uk = ui uk
On Jul 27, 7:00 pm, schoenfeld....@gmail.com wrote: On Jul 27, 5:09 am, "Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com" <tttppp...@yahoo.com> wrote: On Jul 25, 1:57 am, schoenfeld....@gmail.com wrote: On Jul 25, 10:29 am, Tom Roberts <tjroberts...@sbcglobal.net> wrote: [...] BTW I have never seen wedge products of vectors; [1] The wedge product
On Jun 23, 3:34=A0pm, "Pmb" <peter.m.br...@somewhere.net> wrote: A common argument against the use of relativistic mass is the fact that the equation E=mc2 says that a body's relativistic mass equals its total energy, so why should we use two terms for what is essentially the same quantity? We should just stay with energy, and use the word "mass" to refer only to rest mass. A deeper
