Search result for Stoltzfus http://www.nnseek.com/Stoltzfus_s.html Search results for Stoltzfus Wed, 23 Jan 2008 22:21:32 PST http://www.nnseek.com/ http://www.nnseek.com/ http://www.nnseek.com/img/64.png 64 64 NNSeek <![CDATA[Re: Natural selection vs mutation - in the news]]> http://www.nnseek.com/e/sci.bio.evolution/natural_selection_vs_mutation_in_the_news_97102082m.html http://www.nnseek.com/e/sci.bio.evolution/natural_selection_vs_mutation_in_the_news_97102082m.html Stoltzfus who do not really agree on the relevance of their conception of "constraint"). They do not claim to be able to distinguish these two competing explanations. The interesting question to ask, in this ...

  Posted In: sci.bio.evolution   no comments   Reply
]]> Wed, 23 Jan 2008 22:21:32 PST <![CDATA[Re: Nei's "new mutation theory" resurrects William Bateson]]> http://www.nnseek.com/e/sci.bio.evolution/nei_s_new_mutation_theory_resurrects_william_bates_96827138m.html http://www.nnseek.com/e/sci.bio.evolution/nei_s_new_mutation_theory_resurrects_william_bates_96827138m.html Stoltzfus provided was and remains, an ... is requesting that the oversimplification that Stoltzfus allowed be corrected before that model... ignore). OTOH the view that Stoltzfus provides cannot be falsified simply ... until they are so incorporated. Stoltzfus refused to listen even though ... random base rate of mutation? Stoltzfus should note that within the ...

  Posted In: sci.bio.evolution   no comments   Reply
]]> Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:52:17 PST <![CDATA[Re: Nei's "new mutation theory" resurrects William Bateson]]> http://www.nnseek.com/e/sci.bio.evolution/nei_s_new_mutation_theory_resurrects_william_bates_96673282m.html http://www.nnseek.com/e/sci.bio.evolution/nei_s_new_mutation_theory_resurrects_william_bates_96673282m.html Stoltzfus, A. 2006. Mutationism and the Dual Causation of Evolutionary Change. Evol Dev 8:304-317). Note that Orr's model is a neo-mutationist ("new mutations") model, and ...

  Posted In: sci.bio.evolution   1 Comment   Reply
]]> Sat, 19 Jan 2008 14:51:35 PST <![CDATA[Re: Nei's "new mutation theory" resurrects William Bateson]]> http://www.nnseek.com/e/sci.bio.evolution/nei_s_new_mutation_theory_resurrects_william_bates_96503810m.html http://www.nnseek.com/e/sci.bio.evolution/nei_s_new_mutation_theory_resurrects_william_bates_96503810m.html stoltzfus@gmail.com> wrote in message news:fmo73r$2g4$1@darwin.ediacara.org... On Jan 15, 2... multiplicity of mutational paths to alternative states (if that's not clear, its explained in Stoltzfus, A. 2006. Mutationism and the Dual Causation of Evolutionary Change. Evol Dev 8:304-317). ...

  Posted In: sci.bio.evolution   no comments   Reply
]]> Thu, 17 Jan 2008 22:47:19 PST <![CDATA[Re: Nei's "new mutation theory" resurrects William Bateson]]> http://www.nnseek.com/e/sci.bio.evolution/nei_s_new_mutation_theory_resurrects_william_bates_96504066m.html http://www.nnseek.com/e/sci.bio.evolution/nei_s_new_mutation_theory_resurrects_william_bates_96504066m.html stoltzfus@gmail.com> wrote:- This [Baer, et al] explains how, in the "new mutations" view that (because it works so ... bias, and differential multiplicity of mutational paths to alternative states (if that's not clear, its explained in Stoltzfus, A. 2006. Mutationism and the Dual Causation of Evolutionary Change. Evol Dev 8:304-317). Note that Orr's ...

  Posted In: sci.bio.evolution   no comments   Reply
]]> Thu, 17 Jan 2008 22:47:19 PST <![CDATA[Re: Nei's "new mutation theory" resurrects William Bateson]]> http://www.nnseek.com/e/sci.bio.evolution/nei_s_new_mutation_theory_resurrects_william_bates_96461058m.html http://www.nnseek.com/e/sci.bio.evolution/nei_s_new_mutation_theory_resurrects_william_bates_96461058m.html Stoltzfus, A. 2006. Mutationism and the Dual Causation of Evolutionary Change. Evol Dev 8:304-317). Note that Orr's model is a neo-mutationist ("new mutations") model, and that ...

  Posted In: sci.bio.evolution   1 Comment   Reply
]]> Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:34:35 PST <![CDATA[Re: Nei's "new mutation theory" resurrects William Bateson]]> http://www.nnseek.com/e/sci.bio.evolution/nei_s_new_mutation_theory_resurrects_william_bates_95912962m.html http://www.nnseek.com/e/sci.bio.evolution/nei_s_new_mutation_theory_resurrects_william_bates_95912962m.html Stoltzfus, 2001 (Evol Dev 3:73-83). In other words, the MS does not totally misunderstand mutation, only the positive aspect of mutation. MS population geneticists have written a gazillion papers on deleterious mutation ...

  Posted In: sci.bio.evolution   no comments   Reply
]]> Mon, 07 Jan 2008 10:24:57 PST <![CDATA[Re: Nei's "new mutation theory" resurrects William Bateson]]> http://www.nnseek.com/e/sci.bio.evolution/nei_s_new_mutation_theory_resurrects_william_bates_95481346m.html http://www.nnseek.com/e/sci.bio.evolution/nei_s_new_mutation_theory_resurrects_william_bates_95481346m.html Stoltzfus (2006) focuses on these four issues.... The initial historical section of Stoltzfus (2006) is followed by two ... section briefly. For details, read Stoltzfus (2006), or Gould's 2002 ...in inappropriate, for reasons explained in Stoltzfus, 2006). Darwin explicitly denied that ... evolution (see work cited in Stoltzfus, 2006). through. So you could ...

  Posted In: sci.bio.evolution   no comments   Reply
]]> Thu, 03 Jan 2008 09:11:04 PST <![CDATA[Re: Nei's "new mutation theory" resurrects William Bateson]]> http://www.nnseek.com/e/sci.bio.evolution/nei_s_new_mutation_theory_resurrects_william_bates_94073090m.html http://www.nnseek.com/e/sci.bio.evolution/nei_s_new_mutation_theory_resurrects_william_bates_94073090m.html stoltzfus@gmail.com wrote: On Nov 3, 12:29 pm, j...@removethispart.gs.washington.edu (Joe Felsenstein) wrote: In article darwin.ediacara.org>, forsdyke wrote: The idea that "natural selection is of secondary importance" in evolution has recently been recalled by Masatoshi Nei in "The New .... I think two other ...

  Posted In: sci.bio.evolution   no comments   Reply
]]> Thu, 20 Dec 2007 11:03:24 PST <![CDATA[Re: Nei's "new mutation theory" resurrects William Bateson]]> http://www.nnseek.com/e/sci.bio.evolution/nei_s_new_mutation_theory_resurrects_william_bates_93907458m.html http://www.nnseek.com/e/sci.bio.evolution/nei_s_new_mutation_theory_resurrects_william_bates_93907458m.html Stoltzfus (2006) which you did not read. I will provide some quotations from the MS architects below. Unfortunately, your statement above reflects an unwillingness to accept evidence-- Dawkins says "X" but you ...

  Posted In: sci.bio.evolution   no comments   Reply
]]> Wed, 19 Dec 2007 10:49:43 PST