rbwinn a écrit : On May 6, 9:53�am, YBM <ybm...@nooos.fr> wrote: rbwinn a �crit : The train with the slower clock would be the one that is moving. �Maybe you could do the same thing with your two spaceships. �The one with the slower clock would be the one in motion. �If both clocks are at the same rate, they are moving toward each other. You miss the whole point

rbwinn a écrit : The train with the slower clock would be the one that is moving. Maybe you could do the same thing with your two spaceships. The one with the slower clock would be the one in motion. If both clocks are at the same rate, they are moving toward each other. You miss the whole point of relativity (galilean or einsteinian). There is no train or spacehip especially

"Florian" <firstname@lastname.net> wrote in message news:1hzyjoi.thrw70pivls0N%%firstname@lastname.net... Greg Neill <gneillREM@OVEsympatico.ca> wrote: Could be a swirl or a stationnary wave, anything that is not random. To the limits of experimental precision, electrons are point particles with no structure. Electrons are not point particles. They are certainly stationary

Greg Neill <gneillREM@OVEsympatico.ca> wrote: Could be a swirl or a stationnary wave, anything that is not random. To the limits of experimental precision, electrons are point particles with no structure. Electrons are not point particles. They are certainly stationary waves. They don't fragment into smaller bits when they are collided (although their energy of motion

<jan.verheul@tiscali.nl> wrote in message news:1163774298.220827.8260@j44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... There IS NO theory in which the universe appears the same, regardless of inertial frame (considering the properties of light). S.R. is a good try, but it won't work because you will get into trouble as soon as you start accelerating. There is a twin-experiment possible with only