... four cars being assembled." 3. You say the owner told you this. Do you need me to quote what you said? Of course not. 4. You claim I convoluted your earlier statemnt. You did! ?You took what I said and extended it to mean that (most of )McGregor's income was derived from built-up cars." What exactly did you mean by the statment "for over five years...

...try to stay focused. I see. Only between you and the owner. It's not something they would have made a press release or any other public statement on. Of course, your previous statemnt Why would a non-public company make press releases on their own business??? Why would they tell a stranger? I think you can do that as easily as ...

... with the owner) I see. Only between you and the owner. It's not something they would have made a press release or any other public statement on. Of course, your previous statemnt Why would a non-public company make press releases on their own business??? I think you can do that as easily as I can - I'm working from a "Popular Mechanics" ...

... for "Set A"). So, given his set theory, following his rules, he produces a statement that is true. Using this statement, and applying his rules, he produces a statement that says the original statemnt is false. This is a paradox. If you don't think Russell's paradox is a paradox, then you don't know what a paradox is. The paradox itself isn't the important thing ...

... for "Set A"). So, given his set theory, following his rules, he produces a statement that is true. Using this statement, and applying his rules, he produces a statement that says the original statemnt is false. This is a paradox. If you don't think Russell's paradox is a paradox, then you don't know what a paradox is. The paradox itself isn't the important thing ...

...something known for "Set A"). So, given his set theory, following his rules, he produces a statement that is true. Using this statement, and applying his rules, he produces a statement that says the original statemnt is false. This is a paradox. If you don't think Russell's paradox is a paradox, then you don't know what a paradox is. The paradox itself isn't the important thing of course -...

...something known for "Set A"). So, given his set theory, following his rules, he produces a statement that is true. Using this statement, and applying his rules, he produces a statement that says the original statemnt is false. This is a paradox. If you don't think Russell's paradox is a paradox, then you don't know what a paradox is. The paradox itself isn't the important thing of course -...

...to. People here often point out that you evade issues- show me where they say that of me. Your'e simply saying anything so as to avoid the real issue- the issue that your statemnts regarding manipulation are nonesense. Here seeeee what I meeeeean? Non-contradictory identification is an assumption, not an axiom. Prove that statement is a true statement, conforms to reality (...

... out of the relationship but for whatever reason can't cut loose. You can't read a few lines and make such conclusions. Women are very "deep" creatures.....theres no handbook on them. You make statemnts based on all the info you can get and you will still be wrong half the time. Not to mention, she did make one very clear statement, it seems. They are sharing a flat and she'd ...

... may want out of the relationship but for whatever reason can't cut loose. You can't read a few lines and make such conclusions. Women are very "deep" creatures.....theres no handbook on them. You make statemnts based on all the info you can get and you will still be wrong half the time. But trouble and drama isn't worth it, not with all the hotties in this world. BN Good ...