...3:25 am Newsgroups: alt.tv.stargate-sg1 From: "Eva" <eva1removet...@ukonline....: O'Neill's conduct on Stargate, the movie Reply | Reply to ... the show! :-)) Eva -- Join the StargateSG-1 SETI@home Team ... O'Neill's conduct on Stargate, the movie Reply | Reply to ... short...I did not enjoy Stargate. This film, unlike others, weren'...so what I saw in Stargate came as little ontological surprise ...
... that ordinary fanboys would have to use to prove my point that there's something wrong with the thinking behind the movie. Sure, make them all go away. On a related note, they smashed Hitler's waxwork at Traussands, again. So tell me....and I am only guessing here, since I didn't see the episode....Did our "heroes" at SG-1 play any active role in these peoples "relocation?"
...understand there is a terrible animated version of SG just being sold That was "Stargate Infinity" and was made quite a few years.... It was utterly dreadful. Apart from the Stargate itself and the basic concept of Stargate Command, it had nothing whatsoever in common with the live-action ... None of the producers or writers of SG-1 were involved. It is best ignored....
Have you seen this ? I understand there is a terrible animated version of SG just being sold -- The Canadian Curmudgeon (in Calgary) End global warming ~ eliminate the cause ~ Gore Suzuki ! Ohmygawd, it's over !
... notably in the Indiana Jones franchise, including the film Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, but also in the season 3 StargateSG-1 episode "Crystal Skull," and perhaps less well known in Her Interactive's casual game "Nancy Drew: Legend of the Crystal Skull". Contents ...
...real personality, and when you do, you realize just how well she sold the character of T'Pol .. Sorry, no. It's easy to sleepwalk your way through a part. Did you see her on StargateSG-1? HORRIBLE. Ditto Jason and the Argonauts. EGAD. Natalie
... In article <47caa8a5$0$14350$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>, "Wouter Valentijn" <liam@valentijn.nu> wrote: Indeed. Someone has been watching too much StargateSG-1. ;-) Damn, you caught me! Indeed. Oh no! It's an catching, we'll soon have "Indeeds" in episodemic proportions. ;-)
...> In article <47caa8a5$0$14350$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>, "Wouter Valentijn" <liam@valentijn.nu> wrote: Indeed. Someone has been watching too much StargateSG-1. ;-) Damn, you caught me! Indeed. -- Star Trek 09: No Shat, No Show. http://www.disneysub.com/board/noshat.jpg
Anybody wrote: In article <47caa8a5$0$14350$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>, "Wouter Valentijn" <liam@valentijn.nu> wrote: Indeed. Someone has been watching too much StargateSG-1. ;-) Damn, you caught me! -- www.woutervalentijn.net www.nksf.scifics.com/nksfseries.html liam=mail
In article <47caa8a5$0$14350$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>, "Wouter Valentijn" <liam@valentijn.nu> wrote: Indeed. Someone has been watching too much StargateSG-1. ;-)
