On Feb 16, 12:20 am, abelard <abela...@abelard.org> wrote: On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:54:08 -0800 (PST), Fran <Fran.B...@gmail.com> wrote: On Feb 14, 10:36 am, "Kurt Schu...@orion.com" <cicer...@rogers.com> wrote: According to one of John F. Kennedy's most authoritative biographers this Democrat's I.Q was only 117, close to the bare minimum for projected college
On Feb 16, 12:20 am, abelard <abela...@abelard.org> wrote: On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:54:08 -0800 (PST), Fran <Fran.B...@gmail.com> wrote: On Feb 14, 10:36 am, "Kurt Schu...@orion.com" <cicer...@rogers.com> wrote: According to one of John F. Kennedy's most authoritative biographers this Democrat's I.Q was only 117, close to the bare minimum for projected college
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:54:08 -0800 (PST), Fran <Fran.Beta@gmail.com> wrote: On Feb 14, 10:36 am, "Kurt Schu...@orion.com" <cicer...@rogers.com> wrote: According to one of John F. Kennedy's most authoritative biographers this Democrat's I.Q was only 117, close to the bare minimum for projected college success. Bush's I.Q. as revealed by his college and Yale records is 125, which
You're misunderstanding for safety in the space program is a common one, but do not attempt to restate my argument in such as to twist my point. So if you would like me to point where your logic fails I will do so, but do I think you know exactly where you're fallacies of reasoning are and will just point our 1 for now. The debate we are having is healthy, and representative of the historic
CALL FOR PAPERS & TUTORIAL PROPOSALS Seventh International Andrei Ershov Memorial Conference PERSPECTIVES OF SYSTEM INFORMATICS 15--19 June, 2009, Novosibirsk, Akademgorodok, Russia http://psi.nsc.ru/psi09/index.shtml [AIMS AND SCOPE] PSI is a forum for academic and industrial researchers, developers and users working on topics relating to computer, software
