Stabillity
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

found 1082 articles for 1.302 sec
"André Grafe" <Andre_Grafe@ewt-net.de> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:j1pe7a$buu$1@news.albasani.net... > Am 08.08.2011 19:30, schrieb Karl Boder: >> "Robert Rohling"<roro@mailinator.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag >> news:4e4018c4$0$6569$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net... >>> "Karl Boder"<reply-to-group-danke-sehr@arcor.de> wrote in >>> news:4e4009bc$0 >>> $7608$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor     

Group: de.talk.tagesgeschehen · Group Profile · Search for Stabillity in de.talk.tagesgeschehen
Author: Karl Boder
Date: Aug 9, 2011 09:07

"André Grafe" <Andre_Grafe@ewt-net.de> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:j1pe7a$buu$1@news.albasani.net... Am 08.08.2011 19:30, schrieb Karl Boder: "Robert Rohling"<roro@mailinator.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:4e4018c4$0$6569$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net... "Karl Boder"<reply-to-group-danke-sehr@arcor.de> wrote in news:4e4009bc$0 $7608$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor
Show full article (1.87Kb)
On Apr 29, 2:01 pm, "Robert L. Oldershaw" <rlolders...@amherst.edu> wrote: > Mass range 100 MeV - 1860 MeV > > Bin Heights reflect particle widths, i.e., their stability > > Experimental spectrum is compared with expectation values derived from > M = (sqrt n)(revised Planck mass). > > My graphics skills are a bit weak, but the results are definitely > worth a look. > > TO GET A FREE COPY     

Group: de.soc.politik.misc · Group Profile · Search for Stabillity in de.soc.politik.misc
Author: Karl Boder
Date: Aug 9, 2011 09:07

On May 13, 6:43 pm, "Al.Riv...@gmail.com" <al.riv...@gmail.com> wrote: {j(j+1)/a} = 1/2  3/4  4/3 3/2  2 5/2 15/4 4 15/2             =  0.5, 0.75, 1.33, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.75, 4, 7.5 Now you do not predict Xi (1530) anymore, so I hope that you agree with me that such prediction, in your previous model, was substandard. ------------------------------ Jeez, you are a SLOW STUDY!
Show full article (1.87Kb)
On May 13, 6:43 pm, "Al.Riv...@gmail.com" <al.riv...@gmail.com> wrote: > > {j(j+1)/a} = 1/2  3/4  4/3 3/2  2 5/2 15/4 4 15/2 >             =  0.5, 0.75, 1.33, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.75, 4, 7.5 > > Now you do not predict Xi (1530) anymore, so I hope that you agree > with me that such prediction, in your previous model, was > substandard. ------------------------------ Jeez, you are a SLOW STUDY!     

Group: sci.physics.relativity · Group Profile · Search for Stabillity in sci.physics.relativity
Author: Don Stockbauer
Date: May 31, 2010 21:30

On May 13, 6:43 pm, "Al.Riv...@gmail.com" <al.riv...@gmail.com> wrote: {j(j+1)/a} = 1/2  3/4  4/3 3/2  2 5/2 15/4 4 15/2             =  0.5, 0.75, 1.33, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.75, 4, 7.5 Now you do not predict Xi (1530) anymore, so I hope that you agree with me that such prediction, in your previous model, was substandard. ------------------------------ Jeez, you are a SLOW STUDY!
Show full article (0.55Kb)
On 13 mayo, 17:58, "Robert L. Oldershaw" <rlolders...@amherst.edu> wrote: > fine structure of the mass/stability spectrum, then you can lump ALL > particles into one sample and consider that the particles differ only > in mass and spin. Still, it is a bit confusing that you keep speaking of spin and angular momentum. All the particles you are using in your postdiction have spin either     

Group: sci.physics.relativity · Group Profile · Search for Stabillity in sci.physics.relativity
Author: Robert L. Oldershaw
Date: May 13, 2010 18:43

On 13 mayo, 17:58, "Robert L. Oldershaw" <rlolders...@amherst.edu> wrote: fine structure of the mass/stability spectrum, then you can lump ALL particles into one sample and consider that the particles differ only in mass and spin. Still, it is a bit confusing that you keep speaking of spin and angular momentum. All the particles you are using in your postdiction have spin either
Show full article (0.94Kb) · Show article thread
On 13 mayo, 17:58, "Robert L. Oldershaw" <rlolders...@amherst.edu> wrote: > fine structure of the mass/stability spectrum, then you can lump ALL > particles into one sample and consider that the particles differ only > in mass and spin. Still, it is a bit confusing that you keep speaking of spin and angular momentum. All the particles you are using in your postdiction have spin either     

Group: sci.physics.particle · Group Profile · Search for Stabillity in sci.physics.particle
Author: Robert L. Oldershaw
Date: May 13, 2010 18:43

On May 12, 8:45 am, leucipo2001 <al.riv...@gmail.com> wrote: particle spectrum according J and M^2. Your theory should explain all of the Regge phenomenology because it is experimental result, and a valid theory must fit with experimental results. If you are grouping the trajectories in a different way, you should explain why your fit is more valid than the traditional. --------
Show full article (0.94Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: sci.physics · Group Profile · Search for Stabillity in sci.physics
Author: Robert L. Oldershaw
Date: May 13, 2010 18:43

Show full article (0.94Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: sci.physics.relativity · Group Profile · Search for Stabillity in sci.physics.relativity
Author: Al.Rivero
Date: May 13, 2010 13:22

Show full article (3.48Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: sci.physics.particle · Group Profile · Search for Stabillity in sci.physics.particle
Author: Al.Rivero
Date: May 13, 2010 13:22

Show full article (3.48Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: sci.physics · Group Profile · Search for Stabillity in sci.physics
Author: Al.Rivero
Date: May 13, 2010 13:22

Show full article (3.48Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: sci.physics.relativity · Group Profile · Search for Stabillity in sci.physics.relativity
Author: Robert L. Oldershaw
Date: May 13, 2010 08:58

Show full article (1.02Kb)
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · next