Did you install the updates to Sonar 6? I seem to remember that one had a few noticeable bugs when it came out, but they were fixed by later patches. I never install a new Sonar until the first patch is out. :-) Cheers, Martin On 10-05-13 07:04 AM, rr wrote: (re-post from level6productions) Haven't used Sonar in well over a year. Been a user since cakewalk days. Wifey needed
(re-post from level6productions) Haven't used Sonar in well over a year. Been a user since cakewalk days. Wifey needed me to cut a couple of piano tracks for her last night, which they'd be using in the studio today. Should've been a quickie. I installed Sonar 6 from CD (new machine), then set it up to work with my Lexicon Lambda. Everything seemed to be working on audio tracks but she wanted
On Sep 7, 5:18 am, "Jim Wilkins" <muratla...@gmail.com> wrote: It could hide from a few scattered aircraft but any concentration would keep it down and defenseless against them and their sonobuoys and homing torpedos. In the heavily patrolled Bay of Biscay radar warning receivers sounded off continuously and uselessly. jsw The USN tested the Type XXI and found that when using
On Sep 7, 4:22 am, "Keith Willshaw" <keithnos...@demon.co.uk> wrote: Eunometic wrote: Ofcourse given the Type XXI's great under water range and speed, its RAM coated stealthy schnorkel, its passive and active warning devices (including episcope and hydrophones that could also help warn of aircraft) it was unlikely to be caught by allied aircraft. Well the fact that most
"Eunometic" <eunometic@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message news:409ecea2-a6ae-4c9c-ace1-37a08c58c7d6@m5g2000prh.googlegroups.com... The US Torpedo Data Computer could aim torpedos automatically from sound bearings at the START of the war, if the ocean state permitted, which it didn't most of the time, based on comments of skippers in their memoirs. http://www.hnsa.org/doc/tdc/pg076
