So Far So Good
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
 Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...
found 95 articles for 5.608 sec
On Thu, 19 May 2011 09:05:02 +0200, Oliver Sch@d wrote: > Burkhard Ott wrote: > >> On Wed, 18 May 2011 12:47:50 +0000, Juergen Ilse wrote: >> >>> Steht die Policy fuer den Filter fest, koennte ich ihn auch komplett >>> in Hardware realisieren (nur waere dann fuer Aenderungen an der Policy >>> jeweils die Hardware gegen andere zu tauschen, eine Notwendigkeit, die >>> man i.d.R. lieber vermeiden     

Group: de.comp.os.unix.linux.misc · Group Profile · Search for So Far So Good in de.comp.os.unix.linux.misc
Author: Burkhard Ott
Date: May 19, 2011 00:35

Juergen Ilse wrote: Hallo, Burkhard Ott <news2009@revenuewire.com> wrote: On Wed, 18 May 2011 12:47:50 +0000, Juergen Ilse wrote: Steht die Policy fuer den Filter fest, koennte ich ihn auch komplett in Hardware realisieren (nur waere dann fuer Aenderungen an der Policy jeweils die Hardware gegen andere zu tauschen, eine Notwendigkeit, die man i.d.R. lieber vermeiden
Show full article (1.87Kb) · Show article thread
Burkhard Ott wrote: > On Wed, 18 May 2011 12:47:50 +0000, Juergen Ilse wrote: > >> Steht die Policy fuer den Filter fest, koennte ich ihn auch komplett >> in Hardware realisieren (nur waere dann fuer Aenderungen an der >> Policy jeweils die Hardware gegen andere zu tauschen, eine >> Notwendigkeit, die man i.d.R. lieber vermeiden wuerde, weshalb man >> dann zumindest Teile die sich aendern     

Group: de.comp.os.unix.linux.misc · Group Profile · Search for So Far So Good in de.comp.os.unix.linux.misc
Author: Oliver Sch
Date: May 19, 2011 00:15

Hallo, Burkhard Ott <news2009@revenuewire.com> wrote: On Wed, 18 May 2011 12:47:50 +0000, Juergen Ilse wrote: Steht die Policy fuer den Filter fest, koennte ich ihn auch komplett in Hardware realisieren (nur waere dann fuer Aenderungen an der Policy jeweils die Hardware gegen andere zu tauschen, eine Notwendigkeit, die man i.d.R. lieber vermeiden wuerde, weshalb man dann zumindest
Show full article (1.66Kb) · Show article thread
On Wed, 18 May 2011 12:47:50 +0000, Juergen Ilse wrote: > Steht die Policy fuer den Filter fest, koennte ich ihn auch komplett in > Hardware realisieren (nur waere dann fuer Aenderungen an der Policy > jeweils die Hardware gegen andere zu tauschen, eine Notwendigkeit, die > man i.d.R. lieber vermeiden wuerde, weshalb man dann zumindest Teile die > sich aendern koennen doch mit Hilfe von Software     

Group: de.comp.os.unix.linux.misc · Group Profile · Search for So Far So Good in de.comp.os.unix.linux.misc
Author: Oliver Sch
Date: May 19, 2011 00:05

On Tuesday 08 June 2010 11:16 in alt.os.linux.mandriva, somebody identifying as Peter D. wrote... I'm using k3b on 2009.1 to burn iso images to optical media. I always check the "verify" option. And k3b usually reports that the burnt media verifies. So far so good. However, when reading back data from /dev/dvd1 and piping it through md5sum the results are different from the
Show full article (1.76Kb) · Show article thread
I'm using k3b on 2009.1 to burn iso images to optical media. I always check the "verify" option. And k3b usually reports that the burnt media verifies. So far so good. However, when reading back data from /dev/dvd1 and piping it through md5sum the results are different from the md5sum of the iso. Surprisingly the md5sums are consistent - they just disagree with the md5sum of the     

Group: de.comp.os.unix.linux.misc · Group Profile · Search for So Far So Good in de.comp.os.unix.linux.misc
Author: Juergen Ilse
Date: May 18, 2011 23:59

On 06/07/2010 12:56 PM, Baron d'Holbach ~1723-1789~ wrote: Constance Greenglass wrote: Well,they spayed Chrome,and named it Iron. So far so good. Why not an Iron Operating System when Chrome OS goes for PCs? I sure hope that's soon Iron is just a rebranded Chromium browser Iron is more than just a rebranding. <http://www.srware.net/en/software_srware_iron_chrome_vs_iron.php
Show full article (1.28Kb) · Show article thread
On Mon, 07 Jun 2010 12:08:55 -0700, Rita <Rita@nowhere.com> wrote: >On Mon, 07 Jun 2010 11:48:43 -0700, Rumpelstiltskin ><PleaseDoNotReplyByEmail@nowhere.net> wrote: > >>On Mon, 07 Jun 2010 10:09:47 -0700, Rita <Rita@nowhere.com> wrote: >> >>>On Mon, 07 Jun 2010 11:36:34 -0500, High Miles >>><2blues1723@comcast.net> wrote: >>> >>>>Rita wrote: >>>>> On Mon, 07 Jun 2010 01:20:22 -0700, Rumpelstiltskin     

Group: de.comp.os.unix.linux.misc · Group Profile · Search for So Far So Good in de.comp.os.unix.linux.misc
Author: Burkhard Ott
Date: May 18, 2011 22:34

On Jun 7, 12:56 pm, Baron d'Holbach ~1723-1789~ <ba...@holbach.invalid> wrote: Constance Greenglass wrote: Well,they spayed Chrome,and named it Iron. So far so good.  Why not an Iron Operating System when Chrome OS goes for PCs?  I sure hope that's soon Iron is just a rebranded Chromium browser -- Slackware GNU/Linux 13.1 ~ Seamonkey 2.0.4 Yah,its Chrome but its
Show full article (0.89Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.os.linux.mandriva · Group Profile · Search for So Far So Good in alt.os.linux.mandriva
Author: Aragorn
Date: Jun 8, 2010 02:30

Show full article (1.10Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.os.linux.mandriva · Group Profile · Search for So Far So Good in alt.os.linux.mandriva
Author: Peter D.
Date: Jun 8, 2010 02:16

Show full article (1.50Kb)
    

Group: alt.comp.freeware · Group Profile · Search for So Far So Good in alt.comp.freeware
Author: Craig
Date: Jun 7, 2010 14:23

Show full article (0.64Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: soc.retirement · Group Profile · Search for So Far So Good in soc.retirement
Author: El Castor
Date: Jun 7, 2010 13:48

Show full article (3.50Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.comp.freeware · Group Profile · Search for So Far So Good in alt.comp.freeware
Author: Constance Greenglass
Date: Jun 7, 2010 13:17

Show full article (0.54Kb) · Show article thread
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · next