Barbara Schwarz wrote: TruthSeeker wrote: I am with you, Barbara Well, it is just the first draft, and yes, I am shooting from the hip, I have not much time to spend on this. Unlike the extremists, I have a life. Also, the untalented ARS extremists are not worth the time of proofreading. But I am sure glad that you enjoy it. Barbara Schwarz The
Sorry, sweetie. You're wrong. Lurked for about 6 months, and finally you pissed me off enough to post. Yeah, you got it spot on with me "hating" $cientology as a cult. But posting here for years? Hell, no! You got a genuine, bona-fide ARS virgin here. And you're still a whack job, hun. Which nuthouse did you come from? Ren. "Barbara Schwarz" <barbara.schwarz@gmail.com> wrote in message
Jeez... What an introduction to ARS for a first time (long time lurker) poster... If I hadn't already thought as much, I'd now say that the $cienos are a bunch of whack-jobs. Ren. "Barbara Schwarz" <barbara.schwarz@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1165012726.982699.263810@j44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... TruthSeeker wrote: I am with you, Barbara Well, it is just the
Fred Durks wrote: Barbara Schwarz wrote: TruthSeeker wrote: I am with you, Barbara Well, it is just the first draft, and yes, I am shooting from the hip, I have not much time to spend on this. Unlike the extremists, I have a life. Also, the untalented ARS extremists are not worth the time of proofreading. But I am sure glad that you enjoy it.
You should bet. You must not give Single higher spades a free card. A player holding just the jack or ten of spades will probably fold here (afraid that you have a high spade), saving you the pot if a spade falls on the next card. Also, no fourth street cards will make a second best hand which will give you action. If a player holds the king or queen of spades, he will probably call, but will
