arnab.z@gmail wrote: On Dec 8, 7:18 pm, stephenj <s...@cox.net> wrote: arnab.z@gmail wrote: On Dec 7, 4:56 pm, Shakes <kvcsh...@gmail.com> wrote: On Dec 7, 2:22 am, "arnab.z@gmail" <arnab.zah...@gmail.com> wrote: Whisper wrote: arnab.z@gmail wrote: Wow, the slams are different. And Jeez, people weigh them differently. Get over it
arnab.z@gmail wrote: On Dec 7, 4:56 pm, Shakes <kvcsh...@gmail.com> wrote: On Dec 7, 2:22 am, "arnab.z@gmail" <arnab.zah...@gmail.com> wrote: Whisper wrote: arnab.z@gmail wrote: Wow, the slams are different. And Jeez, people weigh them differently. Get over it. -- Cheers, vc It's absolute baloney. When
The second portion of that seems to have gotten hashed up .. so here's how it SHOULD have read .... 2) Secondly, the script doesn't pick up the local ip address for my USB Internet connection, if it's not specified (perhaps understandably sinceit's a USB connection rather than via a network card). Anyhow something likethis works fine .... $Winsock = New-Object -ComObject "MSWinsock
This is guaranteed spam from unconfirmed opt-in mailing lists for spurious addresses at poopypants.com or other vanity domains. hormboy@fw.merk.com is a USENET spamtrap seed. ---------------------- From ali_zongo029@hotmail.fr Wed Oct 17 09:15:11 2007 Received: from mx0.public.com (mx0.public.com [66.112.160.20]) by public.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id l9HDFBKk030582 for <x@public
Greetings, We have been running FreeBSD on our mail servers for about as long as I can remember. Recently, we decided to go SMP to handle increased mail load. After assembling the hardware, installing the OS and software, and restoring all of our data, we noticed in testing that our first machine began hanging semi-regularly when it began processing lots of mail. Disabling SMP eliminated
