Sin10
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

found 7 articles for 0.034 sec
J.F. napisał(a): > On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 18:37:27 +0100, venioo wrote: >>tornad pisze: >> >>>2000N to jest wg mnie (starej daty) okolo 200kG. To jest chyba jakas zabawka? Ano zabawka - taka dydaktyczna ;) >>Dlaczego? Przeciez to ma byc wciagarka, a nie dzwig. Nie podnosi do gory >>2000kg. >>Jak laweta nachylona pod katem 10* a samochod ma 1000kG (10kN), to zeby >>uklad byl w rownowadze     

Group: pl.sci.inzynieria · Group Profile · Search for Sin10 in pl.sci.inzynieria
Author: zbigi
Date: Nov 6, 2007 10:25

Michał Grodecki pisze: Dnia 2007-11-06 18:37, Użytkownik venioo napisał: tornad pisze: 2000N to jest wg mnie (starej daty) okolo 200kG. To jest chyba jakas zabawka? Dlaczego? Przeciez to ma byc wciagarka, a nie dzwig. Nie podnosi do gory 2000kg. Jak laweta nachylona pod katem 10* a samochod ma 1000kG (10kN), to zeby uklad byl w rownowadze (samochod nie zjezdzal
Show full article (1.26Kb) · Show article thread
On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 18:37:27 +0100, venioo wrote: >tornad pisze: >> 2000N to jest wg mnie (starej daty) okolo 200kG. To jest chyba jakas zabawka? > >Dlaczego? Przeciez to ma byc wciagarka, a nie dzwig. Nie podnosi do gory >2000kg. > >Jak laweta nachylona pod katem 10* a samochod ma 1000kG (10kN), to zeby >uklad byl w rownowadze (samochod nie zjezdzal ani nie byl wciagany): >sin10* x 10000N     

Group: pl.sci.inzynieria · Group Profile · Search for Sin10 in pl.sci.inzynieria
Author: venioo
Date: Nov 6, 2007 09:50

Dnia 2007-11-06 18:37, Użytkownik venioo napisał: tornad pisze: 2000N to jest wg mnie (starej daty) okolo 200kG. To jest chyba jakas zabawka? Dlaczego? Przeciez to ma byc wciagarka, a nie dzwig. Nie podnosi do gory 2000kg. Jak laweta nachylona pod katem 10* a samochod ma 1000kG (10kN), to zeby uklad byl w rownowadze (samochod nie zjezdzal ani nie byl wciagany):
Show full article (1.20Kb) · Show article thread
"George Dishman" <george@briar.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:Mc6dnRyBbfywtXXbnZ2dneKdnZygnZ2d@pipex.net... > Max Keon wrote: >> George Dishman wrote: >>> Max Keon wrote: >>>> George Dishman wrote: --- >> I've also been trying to tell you all along that your program >> is only capable of doing what it was designed to do, and that is >> of course to plot a natural orbit path, whether     

Group: pl.sci.inzynieria · Group Profile · Search for Sin10 in pl.sci.inzynieria
Author: J.F.
Date: Nov 6, 2007 09:50

"George Dishman" <george@briar.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:Mc6dnRyBbfywtXXbnZ2dneKdnZygnZ2d@pipex.net... Max Keon wrote: George Dishman wrote: Max Keon wrote: George Dishman wrote: --- I've also been trying to tell you all along that your program is only capable of doing what it was designed to do, and that is of course to plot a natural orbit path, whether
Show full article (0.53Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: pl.sci.inzynieria · Group Profile · Search for Sin10 in pl.sci.inzynieria
Author: Micha³ Grodecki
Date: Nov 6, 2007 09:42

Show full article (0.71Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: pl.sci.inzynieria · Group Profile · Search for Sin10 in pl.sci.inzynieria
Author: venioo
Date: Nov 6, 2007 09:37

Show full article (0.38Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: sci.physics.relativity · Group Profile · Search for Sin10 in sci.physics.relativity
Author: Max Keon
Date: Sep 20, 2007 19:43

Show full article (8.75Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: sci.physics · Group Profile · Search for Sin10 in sci.physics
Author: Max Keon
Date: Sep 20, 2007 19:43

Show full article (8.75Kb) · Show article thread