On May 31, 5:16 pm, poisoned rose <nur...@ward-duty.com> wrote: marcus, with more and more and more sidekick ploys: SNIP And yes...yes...THIS IS MY OPINION There is a way to express an opinion. Your first paragraph above is certainly an opinion, and thus totally fine...the second paragraph strays again into your signature bombast. Now you are criticizing Marcus on the
On Jun 1, 12:52 am, Surfer <n...@spam.net> wrote: On Mon, 31 May 2010 20:29:54 -0700 (PDT), Nick <prochem...@hushmail.com> wrote: <...> If the world needs to spend more on infrastructure to reduce CO2 emissions, NASA will be provided with less money, not more. So why would NASA supply evidence for AGW if the evidence wasn't genuine? Ø Hansen and his sidekick Schmidt
At 29 Jan 2010 03:50:30 -0500 nospam wrote: In article <Diw8n.10649$3n2.2322@newsfe01.iad>, Todd Allcock <elecconnec@AnoOspamL.com> wrote: Well, unlike AT&T, T-Mo sells neither a metered internet plan, nor a la carte (per KB/MB) data, so selling anything other than an unlimited plan would probably require serious systemic changes in their billing system. Not worth
In article <Diw8n.10649$3n2.2322@newsfe01.iad>, Todd Allcock <elecconnec@AnoOspamL.com> wrote: Well, unlike AT&T, T-Mo sells neither a metered internet plan, nor a la carte (per KB/MB) data, so selling anything other than an unlimited plan would probably require serious systemic changes in their billing system. Not worth it for the miniscule number of customers this product would
At 28 Jan 2010 19:54:40 -0500 nospam wrote: I think Dennis' point was the difficulty of placing the "unlocked" iPad on a non-"partner" carrier. T-Mobile, for example, right here in the USA doesn't use these SIMs, and likely won't be anytime soon, so there will be no way to use this "unlocked" device on another carrier in the USA.
